期刊文献+

不同固位技术修复单侧上颌骨缺损的生物力学研究 被引量:3

Biomechanical study on unilateral maxilla restoration using different retention methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用三维有限元分析方法研究卡环、附着体以及颧种植体3种不同固位技术对上颌骨单侧缺损修复的生物力学影响。方法利用医学图像处理软件Mimics重建单侧缺损上颌骨模型,采用镜像技术生成修复体模型,并建立使用不同固位技术修复的上颌骨有限元模型,模拟口腔咬合状态下上颌骨受力状态。结果采用颧种植体固位修复的上颌骨健侧及修复侧上腭应力最大,分别为7.399、4.864 MPa;而且采用颧种植固位使得健侧及修复侧上颌骨应力最小,分别为10.46和10.86 MPa;颧种植体自身应力也最小,为15.25 MPa。结论不同固位技术修复对单侧上颌骨缺损修复效果影响较大。卡环固位及附着体固位由于带有支架可用于分担作用上腭的力,颧种植体固位可通过传递力至颧骨,故可分担作用于上颌骨的力。 Objective To study the biomechanical effects of 3 different retention methods (clasp, attachment or zygomatic implants) on repairing unilateral maxillary defects by using 3D finite element analysis method. Methods The maxillary unilateral defect model was reconstructed by the medical image processing software Mimics. The prosthesis was generated by mirroring technology. After processing, the finite element model of maxillary model by the three different retention methods was established to simulate stress distributions of maxilla during occlu- sion. Results Compared with the other methods, by using zygomatic implant retention method, stresses on af- fected and unaffected palate were the largest as 7. 399 and 4.864 MPa, respectively, while those on affected and unaffected maxilla were the smallest as 10.46 and 10.86 MPa, respectively. Stress on zygomatic implant itself was 15.25 MPa, which was also the smallest. Conclusions Different retention methods had an obvious impact on unilateral maxillary defect restoration. The clasp and attachment retention methods could share the stress on palate by carrying bracket. The zygomatic implant retention method could also share the stress on maxilla by passing the stress to the zygoma.
出处 《医用生物力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期327-333,共7页 Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(11202017) 教育部博士点新教师基金项目(20121102120039) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-12-0024) 北京市自然科学基金项目(7133245)
关键词 上颌骨 有限元分析 固位 应力 生物力学 Maxilla Finite element analysis Retention Stress Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献69

共引文献26

同被引文献27

  • 1冯云枝,冯海兰,吴汉江.上颌骨缺损赝复体修复的临床效果评价[J].口腔医学研究,2006,22(2):182-184. 被引量:23
  • 2Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et aL Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant- A three-dimensional finite element analysis [J].J Oral Rehabil, 2005, 32(4) :279-286.
  • 3Ohashi T, Matsunaga S, Nakahara K, et al. Biomechanical role of peri-implant trabecular structures dur- ing vertical loading [J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2010, 14 (5) : 507 -513.
  • 4Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants; Considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis [J].Clin Oral Impl Res, 2004, 15 (4) : 401-412.
  • 5Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: Clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008, 24(7) : 218-236.
  • 6Restoy LA, Dominguez ML, Infante-Cossio P, et aL Reconstruction of mandibular vertical defects for dental implants with autogenous bone block grafts using a tunnel approach: Clinical study of 50 cases [J]. Inte J Oral Maxi Surg, 2015, 44(11) : 1416-1422.
  • 7皮昕,王美青.口腔解剖生理学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:40.
  • 8Pal US, Dhiman NK, Singh G, et aL Evaluation of im- plants placed immediately or delayed into extraction sites [J]. Nati J Maxi Surg, 2011, 2(1) : 54-60.
  • 9Samachiaro GO, Chu SJ, Sarnachiaro E, et aL Immedi- ate implant placement into extraction sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects= A clinical case series [ J ]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, DOI : 10.1111/cid. 12347.
  • 10Aloy-Pr6sper A, Pefiarrocha-Oltra D, Pe~arrocha-Diago MA, et aL The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: A systematic review [ J ]. Med Oral Pato Oral Cir Bucal, 2015, 20(2) : 251-257.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部