摘要
霍布斯的利维坦假说为后人思考国家主权和公民权利的关系提供了一个经典版本,也产生了利维坦困境。借助于两种自由概念,伯林强化了利维坦困境。罗尔斯的新契约论自由主义国家干涉理论和佩迪特的新共和主义最低限度国家理论分别为解决利维坦困境提供了意见相左但立场鲜明的方案。罗尔斯认为,国家或权力主体对公民权利或自由的限制、干涉和支配是必要的,这构成差别原则的可预见结果。佩迪特则提出了无支配自由理论,试图在最大程度上保护公民权利和自由。虽然佩迪特表示无支配自由理论可以同罗尔斯的初级产品理论兼容,但实际上它是诺齐克所有权理论的新共和主义版本。正像诺齐克的天赋所有权理论不兼容于罗尔斯的初级产品理论一样,无支配自由理论不兼容于初级产品理论,佩迪特在解答利维坦困境上并不成功。
More than 30 years after Isaiah Berlin gave his famous lecture on ＂Two Concepts of Liberty＂ in 1958, Philip Pettit suggested a third concept of liberty, ＂Freedom as Non-domination.＂ Pettit wanted to solve a problem that Hobbes encountered in his Leviathan when he tried to construct a theory of contract between the sovereign princes and their subjects （or between the state authority and its citizens）, and to remove the 20th century＇s anxiety as exposed by Berlin that ＂when the state power becomes stronger, the people have fewer rights. ＂ Then, has Pettit been successful.9 It is an issue I want to discuss here.
出处
《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期31-39,共9页
Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(13ZXA016)
关键词
利维坦
消极自由
积极自由
初级产品
所有权
无干涉自由
无支配自由
Leviathan
negative liberty
positive liberty
primary goods
holdings
freedom asnon-interference
freedom as non-domination
