期刊文献+

腹腔镜技术在中低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值与评价 被引量:18

Assesment of laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer with sphincter preservation
原文传递
导出
摘要 腹腔镜中低位直肠癌手术的应用和可行性得到了大量临床研究的证实,其在中低位直肠癌保肛手术的优势日趋明显。腹腔镜下可以严格遵守肿瘤根治原则和保肛要求,同时保证了保肛手术的安全性。腹腔镜的放大作用使得在肛门括约肌保留和神经保护等方面可能较开腹更有优势,并尽可能保留病人的排便控制功能以及膀胱功能和性功能。最新的临床研究结果肯定了腹腔镜在中低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值,显示了乐观的前景,但其临床应用仍需多中心前瞻性随机对照研究数据的支持。 The application and feasibility of laparoscopic procedure for mid-low rectal cancer were confirmed by increasing clinical studies.The advantages of sphincter preservation for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were shown in a growing body of literatures.Laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer could strictly adhere to the oncological principle and sphincter-preservating requirement to guarantee the oncologic safty.Laparoscopic multiplication might be superior to the open surgery in terms of anal sphincter saving and nerves protecting,and could retain Defecation control ability,bladder and sexual function.In conclusion,the data from the recent trials have shown promising clinical benefits of short-term advantages as well as long-term oncologic equivalence for laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer in sphincter preservation resection.However,adequately powered,multiple center trials are justified and necessary to assess the role of laparoscopy in mid-low rectal cancer sphincter-preservating surgery.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期834-837,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠肿瘤 保肛手术 laparoscopy mid-low rectal cancer sphincter preservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1池畔,林惠铭,徐宗斌.腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌低位前切除术后吻合口瘘发生率的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(1):57-59. 被引量:46
  • 2Guillon PJ, Darzi A, Monson JR. Experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignant disease. Surg Oncol, 1993,2 (suppl 1 ) : 43-49.
  • 3Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17:1-12.
  • 4Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies(minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg, 2003,73:712-716.
  • 5Mober D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parellel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2001,1:2.
  • 6Staudacher C, Vignali A, Saverio DP, et al. Laparoscopicvs. open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007,50 : 1324-1331.
  • 7Christophe L, Paumet T, Fabien L, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Colorectal Dis, 2012,14: 35-41.
  • 8Ding KF, Chen R, Zhang JL, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer: results of a Chinese three-center case-control study. Surg Endosc, 2009,23:854- 861.
  • 9Gonzalez QH, Rodriguez-Zentner HA, Moreno-Berber JM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City. Am Surg, 2009,75:33-38.
  • 10Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J, Pechlivanides G, et al. Lapamscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of a comparative non-randomised study. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009,24:761-769.

共引文献46

同被引文献149

引证文献18

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部