期刊文献+

信息影响下区分潜在类别的公交线路选择模型 被引量:6

Bus route choice model under influence of information accounting for latent class
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为分析实时公交运行信息和用户自身偏好对公交用户路径选择行为的影响,引入三角分布描述公交信息的不确定性,并使用前景函数替代效用函数描述出行者决策的不完全理性,建立基于前景函数的选择概率模型。为进一步区分不同出行者偏好差异,在前景模型的基础上结合潜在类别模型,构建区分出行者潜在类别的前景概率模型。利用2013年北京市的实际调查数据进行参数估计并检验。结果表明:a)出行者的选择行为受自身的偏好影响;b)基于景函数的选择模型比传统的效用函数模型拟合度更好、更贴合实际选择行为;c)区分潜在类别模型的统计学特征更优秀;d)多数公交用户对等车时间更敏感。通过各种措施缩短等车时间或直觉等车时间比提高公交运行速度更能吸引乘客。 In order to analyze the effect of real time bus operation information and bus travelers' preference on route choice behavior, this paper described the uncertainty of bus information by using triangular distribution, replaced the utility function with prospect theory function to represent the incomplete rational decision of bus travelers, and established the choice probabili- ty model based on the prospect theory. For the purpose of classifying the different travelers' individual preference heterogenei- ty,it established a prospect probability model of distinguishing latent class by integrating the latent class model with the pros- pect model,then it estimated the model' s parameters and tested the model by utilizing the actual survey data of Beijing (2013). The results indicate that: a)Bus travelers'individual preference has an influence on their route choice behavior; b) The route choice model based on prospect theory has a better goodness-of-fit and is more realistic with the actual choice behavior than the traditional utility function model;c )The prospect theory selection probability model has better demographic characteristics; d) Most bus travelers are more sensitive to waiting time. Cutting waiting time or instinctive waiting time is more attractive than improving bus operation velocity.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期2937-2940,2981,共5页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50908196) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWJTU09ZT18) 四川省学术和技术带头人培养资金资助项目(川人办发[2008]24号)
关键词 城市交通 公交线路选择 信息影响 前景理论 偏好 urban traffic bus route choice information affects prospect theory individual preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1DU L B.Motives, behaviors, and attachments:a comparative study between older travelers and younger travelers in national scenic area[D].Central County:The Pennsylvania State University,2005.
  • 2王日凤,钟宁.高级认知过程对人脑信号活动模式的影响及认知系统仿真[J].计算机应用研究,2011,28(9):3279-3283. 被引量:2
  • 3王敏.免疫克隆算法求解公交发车频率问题[J].计算机应用研究,2010,27(12):4483-4485. 被引量:2
  • 4DZIEKAN K, VERMEULEN A J.Psychologicale effects of and design preferences for real-time information displays[J].Journal of Public Transportation,2006,9(1):1-19.
  • 5DZIEKAN K, KOTTENHOFF K.Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport:effects on customers[J].Transportation Research Part A,2007,41(6):489-501.
  • 6王向华,陈特放.智能体技术在公交调度系统中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(8):3539-3545. 被引量:11
  • 7De CEA J, FMANDEZ J E.Transit assignment to minimal routes:an efficient new algorithm[J].Traffic Engineering and Control,1989,30(10):491-494.
  • 8曾建敏.实验检验累积前景理论[J].暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版),2007,28(1):44-47. 被引量:58
  • 9KAMAKURA W A, RUSSELL G A.A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1989,26(4):379-390.
  • 10HICKMAN M D, WILSON N H M.Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information[J].Transportation Research Part C,1995,3(4):211-226.

二级参考文献48

  • 1高波,费奇.从现实世界到MAS世界——基于MAS理论的复杂系统建模思想探讨[J].科学学研究,2005,23(2):179-183. 被引量:10
  • 2于滨,杨忠振,程春田,左志.公交线路发车频率优化的双层规划模型及其解法[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2006,36(5):664-668. 被引量:24
  • 3曹亦文,巨永锋,陈锋.城市公交车发车频率优化模型[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(2):29-32. 被引量:9
  • 4HWANG T Y,TSAI C M,HUANG C C,et al.System optimal compensators placement via immune multi-objective algorithm[J].WSEAS Trans on Systems,2009,8(5):604-613.
  • 5ZUO Xing-quan,MO Hong-wei,WU Jian-ping.A robust scheduling method based on a multi-objective immune algorithm[J].Information Sciences,2009,179(19):3359-3369.
  • 6SHAFIR E. Decision Making[ M]//WILSON R A, KEIL F C. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences.Massachusetts : The MIT Press, 2001:220 - 223.
  • 7FRIEDMAN M, SAVAGE L J. The utility analysis of choices involving risks [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1948, (56) :279 - 304.
  • 8ARROW K J. Essays in the theory of risk-bearing [ M ].Chicago: Markham, 1971.
  • 9KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk [ J]. Econometrica,1979, (47) :263 - 291.
  • 10TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in Prospect theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty [ J ].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992,(5) :297 -323.

共引文献108

同被引文献47

  • 1金凡.路权与公交路权优先[J].建设科技,2007(9):29-29. 被引量:5
  • 2WilliamH.K.Lam, Hai-JunHuang. Combined activity/ travel choice models: time-dependent and dynamic versions [J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2003, 3 (3): 323-347.
  • 3Mitsuhisa Tanaka, Nobuhiro Uno,Yasuhiro Shiomi, Yoongho Ahn.Experimental study of effects of travel time distribution information on dynamic route choice behavior [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 18 (2): 215- 226.
  • 4Zheng Li, David A. Hensher. Behavioural implications of preferences, risk attitudes and beliefs in modelling risky travel choice with travel time variability [J]. Transportation, 2013, 40 (3): 505-523.
  • 5Caspar G. Chorus, Michel Bierlaire.An empirical comparison of travel choice models that capture preferences for compromise alternatives [J]. Transportation, 2013, 40 (3): .549-562.
  • 6Fumitaka Kurauchi, Jan-Dirk Schmocker, Hiroshi Shimamoto, Seham M. Hassan. Variability of commuters' bus line choice: an analysis of oyster card data [J]. Public TransPort. 2014. 6 (1-2): 21-34.
  • 7钱萌,彭张节,程树林,王少华,钱秀.基于综合评价指数的城市公交线路选择优化模型[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2008,26(2):180-185. 被引量:17
  • 8康晓军,王茂才.基于遗传算法的最短路径问题求解[J].计算机工程与应用,2008,44(23):22-23. 被引量:16
  • 9李睿,余剑峰,林亚平,张锦,李珩.基于公交网和道路交通网的出行线路选择算法研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(10):80-84. 被引量:3
  • 10周文峰,李珍萍,刘洪伟,王吉光.最优公交线路选择问题的数学模型及算法[J].运筹与管理,2008,17(5):80-84. 被引量:11

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部