非法经营罪堵截条款异化之研究

Alienation of Provisions on the Prevention of Dlegal Business Operation

将非法经营罪堵截条款构成要件的异化,归结于具有高度抽象性和概括性堵截条款的立法规定,是一种虚假的表象性认识;在适用中司法人员对堵截条款的曲解才是非法经营罪堵截条款异化的实质。是故,对非法经营罪堵截条款异化的限缩应立足于司法而不是立法。教义学的分析路径可以在司法适用中实现对非法经营罪堵截条款异化的限缩。基于《刑法》第225条的规定,教义学视阈下非法经营罪堵截条款司法适用的具体限缩,应从"违反国家规定"、"其他扰乱市场秩序的非法经营行为"和"情节严重"三个方面展开。虽说"网络水军"具有较大的社会危害性,但并不符合非法经营罪的构成要件,司法解释将其以非法经营罪论处,有违罪刑法定之嫌。

Ascribing the alienation of the constitutive elements of provisions on the pre- vention of the crime of illegal business operation in the Criminal Law to the highly abstract and general nature of preventive provisions is only a false figurative understanding： the misinterpre- tation by judicial personnel of preventive provisions is the essence of such alienation. Therefore, the curtailment of alienation of provisions on the prevention of the crime of illegal business oper- ation should be＇based on judicial practice, rather than legislation. Analysis from the perspective of dogmatics can realize this curtailment in judicial application. Based on Article 225 of the ~_ t rtailment of iudicial application of preventive provisions on the ishment for a specified crime