期刊文献+

论网络攻击在国际法上的归因 被引量:29

The Attribution of Cyber Attacks under International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 大多数网络攻击的私人性和隐秘性特点,使得这类攻击在国际法上的归因成为一个较为复杂的问题。近年来,国际社会日益重视对这一问题的讨论,并提出了种种放宽甚至取消国际法上既有归因标准的主张。但是,这些主张在强调受害国维护自身网络安全需要的同时,忽视了其他国家受到无辜波及的风险,具有不同程度的片面性和局限性。对网络攻击确定国家责任的前提,是通过国际法进行负责任的归因,既不应使实际从事和控制网络攻击的国家逍遥法外,也不应扩大国家责任的范围而伤及无辜。联合国国际法委员会2001年《国家责任条款》中确定的归因规则,对于网络攻击的归因仍然发挥着不可替代的作用。 The attribution of cyber attacks under international law is an important and complicated issue, due mainly to the anonymous and private nature of most cyber attacks. In re- cent years, scholars from western countries have paid more and more attention to this issue, and have made various proposals to loosen and even abolish the existing attribution standards in in- ternational law, so as to facilitate the attribution of cyber attacks to states which arguably should be responsible. However, these proposals, while emphasizing the need of attacked states to en- sure their cyber security, are largely biased and unfounded, in that they ignore the potential risk for innocent states to be unduly held responsible. The precondition of establishing state respon- sibility for cyber attacks is responsible attribution in accordance with international law so that, on the one hand, states actually engaged in cyber attacks are not be allowed to escape interna- tional responsibility and, on the other hand, the scope of state responsibility is not improperly expanded to negatively affect innocent states. In this respect, the attribution rules in the UN In- ternational Law Commission' s 2001 Articles on State Responsibility have an indispensable role to play in the attribution of cyber attacks under international law.
作者 黄志雄
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期157-168,共12页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001).
  • 2Military and Paramilitary in and against Nicaragua, Nicaragua v. US, 1986, judgment of merits, at para. 115.
  • 3Case Concerning the Application of of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide, judgment.
  • 4Prosecutor v. Tadic, Trim Chamber judgment of 7 May 1997, at para. 584 -588.
  • 5Case IT-94 -1, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Appeals Chamber Judgment of 1999, I. L. M. , vol. 38, p. 1518(emphasis in origi- nal).
  • 6Prosecutor v. Tadic, Appeals Chamber Judgment.
  • 7Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment of Trim Chamber, ICC -01/04 -01/06, para. 541, p. 248.
  • 8State v. Bruno, in Matthew Lippman, Criminal Law, Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 2nd edition, SAGE publication (2010), p. 199.
  • 9Jason Healey, Beyond Attribution: Seeking National Responsibility for Cyber Attacks, p. 2, at http ://atlanticcouncil. org, visited at March 14, 2014.
  • 10Scott J. Shackeford and Richard B. Andres, State Responsibility for Cyber Attacks: Competing Standards for A Growing Problem, 42 Georgetown Journal of International Law 971 (2011 ), p. 1004.

共引文献3

引证文献29

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部