期刊文献+

中国城市金融效率提升路径探析 被引量:47

Paths of Ascension about Financial Efficiency in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过CCR模型与超效率模型测算中国内地11个城市与香港的金融效率,运用BCC模型和Malmquist指数分解模型对比分析内地与香港金融效率各构成因素差异,结果显示,内地金融效率在技术进步率、纯技术效率、规模效率均与香港存在不同程度差异,按照金融发展程度与金融效率构成因素差异将内地11个城市划分为金融发展较成熟且效率较高、规模效应不足、新兴、不成熟城市4种类型,影响第一类与第三类、第二类与第四类城市金融效率提升的关键因素分别是技术进步、规模效益与投入产出因素。最后,有针对性地借鉴香港经验,探析内地不同类型城市金融效率提升路径。 Based on CRR model and super efficiency (SDEA) model, this paper makes a research to measure financial efficiency between 11 cities in China's Mainland and Hong Kong, and conducts financial elements efficiency and input-output analysis through BBC model and Malmquist index decomposition model. The con- clusion is. There are differences in the rate of technological progress, the pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency between mainland and Hong Kong financial efficiency. Mainland cities can be divided into four categories: mature financial development and high financial efficiency cities, low scale efficiency established finan- cial cities, emerging financial cities and immature financial development cities. The technological progress is the key factor that affect the first and the third type of city's financial efficiencies, the scale and input-output are the key factors that affect the second and the fourth type of city's financial efficiencies. Finally, this paper puts forward paths of ascension about financial efficiency for different cities.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期53-68,83,共17页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 教育部人文科学重点研究基地项目基金(12JJD790036) 深圳市哲学社会科学规划基金项目(125c026) 广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划(Yq2013147) 深圳市城市规划与决策仿真重点实验室开放课题基金项目(UPDMHITSZ2014B07)的资助
关键词 金融效率 结构性差异 提升路径 Financial Efficiency Structural Differences Ascension Path
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献172

共引文献473

同被引文献466

引证文献47

二级引证文献260

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部