教材适切性评价指标体系的理论及实证研究被引量：22

Theoretical and Empirical Study of Evaluation Index System of Textbook Suitability

下载PDF

导出

摘要教材评价是改进教材质量的重要措施,教材适切性评价是教材评价的一个重要方面。教材适切性是教材的内容选择、组织、表达与学生的学习准备和学习需求之间的适合性质及程度,包括教材与学生一般认知规律的适切性、教材与学生一般生活经验的适切性、教材与具体学科思维培养要求的适切性以及教材与具体学科知识技能学习要求的适切性4个维度,共17个评价指标。 Textbook evaluation is an important measure to improve textbooks＇ quality; and textbook suitability evaluation is an important aspect of textbook evaluation. Textbook suitability refers to the qualitative and quantitative characteristics between textbooks and the students＇ study readiness and developmental demands, which includes： the suitability between textbooks and students＇ general cognitive ability; the suitability between textbooks and students＇ life experiences; the suitability between textbooks and demands of＇specific subject; the suitability between textbooks and knowledge and skills in specific subject. Textbook suitability indexes include 4 dimensions and 17 indexes.

作者王晓丽芦咏莉李斌

机构地区教育部基础教育课程教材发展中心北京师范大学心理学院北京第二实验小学

出处《课程．教材．教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期40-45,共6页 Curriculum，Teaching Material and Method

基金首都师范大学首都教育发展协同创新中心重点课题"中国教材政策与评价研究"的阶段性研究成果

关键词适切性教材适切性教材评价评价指标 suitability textbook suitability textbook evaluation evaluation index

分类号 G423.3 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1教师资格认定考试教材编写组.教育心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2008.
2李维．小学儿童教育心理学[M]．北京：高等教育出版社，2001．2.
3林晓枫.数学认知发展准备研究--上海市区(6-7岁)儿童测量[C].全国第六届心理学学术会议文摘选集,1987.
4吴风,潘小明.数学教学应把握学生数学学习的准备[J].教育实践与研究,2002,0(1):44-45. 被引量：1
5Young J, Reigeluth C M. Improving the Textbook Selection Process [M]. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1988.
6Spearman C. The Theory of Two Factors [J]. Psy- chology Review, 1914, 21 (2): 101-115.
7Ree M J, Earles J A. The Stability of g Across Dif- ferent Methods of Estimation [J]. Intelligence, 1991, 15, 271-278.
8Reeve C L, Hakel M D. Asking the Right Questions About g [J]. Human Performance, 2002, 15 (1/ 2) : 47-74.
9Gottfredson L S. Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life [J]. Intelligence, 1997, 24 (1) 79-132.
10Gottfredson L S. Where and Why g Matters. Not a Mystery [J]. Human Performance, 2002, 15 (1/ 2) : 25-46.

二级参考文献4

1李士.“2061计划”和科学素养基准[J].民主与科学,2004(3):36-40. 被引量：3
2高凌飚.教材评价维度与标准[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(06B):8-12. 被引量：89
3American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS Project 2061 Biology Textbooks Evaluation - about the Evaluation [EB/OL]. http: //www. project2061, org/publications/textbook/hsbio/summary/about htm, 2008-1 4.
4American Association for the Advancement of Science. Big Biology Books Fail to Convey Big Ideas, Reports AAAS's Project 2061 [EB/OL]. http:// www. project2061, org/about/press/pr000627, htm, 2008-1-4.