以互补原理的两个维度再审视技术传习的目的与手段之争

A Review on the Disputes over the Purpose and Means of Sports Skill Teaching in Two Dimensions under Complimentary Principle

技术传习是目的还是手段之争是体育教学领域的核心问题,以互补原理来考查这一争论是一种新的尝试。互补思想具有一种特殊的逻辑关系,通常包含两个研究维度。以此考查体育教学会得出两种完全相反的教学思想,即纯粹的技术传习和纯粹的增强体质。前者早有技术健身教学论为代表,后者至今无人认领。体育教学根本分歧的存在基础是养生保健体育观和功利主义教育理念,由于固有价值观难以改变,这种分歧还将长期存在下去。参与论争须表明立场,虽极难改变固有理念,但对于明辨问题原委很有帮助。

Whether sports skill teaching should serve as a purpose or means is a core issue in the field of sports teaching. Using com- plementary principle to examine this dispute is a new attempt. And there exists a special logic lying in complementary ideas, which generally contains two research dimensions. Analyzed in these two dimensions, sports teaching will have two opposite thoughts-- pure skill teaching and pure physical enhancement. One representative of the former is the theory of exercise technique and body-- building, while few people now working on the research of the latter. The fundamental differences in sports teaching are derived from the theories of life cultivation and health preservation and education utilitarianism. Due to the fact that inherent values are diffi- cult to be changed, such disputes will exist for a long time. A clear stance is needed in the debate, which may not necessarily change the status quo but will facilitate the exploration of the essence of this issue.