把字句中“给”的句法性质研究被引量：14

The syntactic nature of Gei in the Ba construction

导出

摘要本文运用Spencer&Luís(2012)的典范附缀理论,探讨现代汉语把字句中"给"的句法性质。研究发现"给"具备典范附缀的所有特征:在形式上具有词缀特征,读轻声,韵律上依赖于宿主,不能独立存在;在分布上具有功能词特征,其位置是相对于动词短语而言的,在辖域上对并列结构取宽域。"给"的功能性特征体现在"给"是逆动化核心词Antipassive0,是真正的句法标记。现代汉语逆动化句法(把字句、将字句和给字句)因此有两种:一种带显性标记,一种带隐性标记。 The paper explores the syntactic nature of Gei in the Ba construction within the canonical clitic theory,as proposed by Spencer &Luís(2012).It argues that Gei manifests the formal properties of affixes,i.e.,toneless and prosodically dependent on some adjacent elements.It also has the properties of functional categories in distribution,i.e.,being placed with respect to syntactic phrases and taking wide scope over a coordinated phrase.Viewed from the perspective of antipassivisation,Gei unidirectionally co-occurs within the Ba construction.Thus,it can be seen as a marker of antipassivisation in Modern Chinese.Therefore,there are two kinds of antipassive constructions in Chinese voice system(including the Ba construction,the Jiang construction and the Gei construction):those with overt markers and those without.

作者叶狂潘海华

机构地区宁波工程学院外国语学院香港九龙塘达之路香港城市大学中文、翻译及语言学系北京语言大学语言科学院

出处《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期656-665,799,共10页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research

关键词典范附缀句法标记逆动化把字句

分类号 H146 [语言文字—汉语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Aldridge, E. 2012. Antipassive and ergativity in Tagalog [J]. Lingua 122: 192-203.
2Anderson, S. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics [M]. Oxford: OUP.
3Bittner, M. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions [J]. HAL 53. 194-231.
4Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [M]. Ox- ford: OUP.
5Creissels, D. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages [R]. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden, August-September 2012.
6Dixon, R. 1994. Ergativity [M]. Cambridge.. CUP.
7McCawley, J. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure [A]. In B. Darden, C. Bailey & A. Davison (eds.). Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society [C]. Chicago.. Chicago Linguistic Society. 71-80.
8Medov, L. 2009. Romance Languages. A Comparative View from an Antipassive Perspec- tive [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Princeton University.
9Kurebito, T. 2012. An outline of valency-reducing operations in Chukchi [J]. Senri Ethno- logical Studies 77: 177-189.
10Polinksy, M. 2005. Antipassive constructions [A]. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures [C]. Oxford.. OUP. 438-441.