期刊文献+

中美贸易救济制度比较及反思

The Comparison and Reflection of Sino-US Trade Remedy Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着经济全球一体化脚步的加快,国际贸易的发展势头也愈来愈强劲。全球化这把双刃剑在给融入国际贸易体制的国家尤其是发展中国家带来更多机会的同时,也不可避免地带来了新的风险与不公平。近年来,国际贸易救济规则不公平竞争、贸易壁垒、贸易保护主义势头愈发猛烈。;因此,对中美贸易救济制度进行比较,为我国贸易救济制度的完善提供可借鉴的经验,是法学界的重要研究课题之一。 With the acceleration of global economic integration, the developing trend of international trade is increasingly strong.Thisdouble-edged sword of globalizafion brings more opportunities to some countries,especially the developing countries,which have inte-grated into the international trade system,at the same time it also inevitably imposes risks and unfairness on them.In recent years,the trend of unfair compotition,trade barriers,trade protectionism are increasingly fierce.Therefore,to compare Sino-US trade remedysystems for providing useful experience for improving our trade remedy system is an important research topic in jurisprudential cir-cle.
作者 卜英莲 刘昕
机构地区 南京财经大学
出处 《行政与法》 2014年第9期120-124,共5页 Administration and Law
关键词 WTO 反倾销法 贸易救济制度 WTO the anti-dumping law trade remedy system
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献56

  • 1胡政武.国际服务贸易救济制度简论[J].重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2):119-123. 被引量:3
  • 2《多哈宣言》第28段.
  • 3US Seeks to Put Hold On Antidumping, Subsidy Negotiations In WTO, Vol 19, No 40, Inside U.S Trade, Oct 5 2001.
  • 4Section 3802(b)(14) of Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002.
  • 5http://www, ustr. gov/trade-agreements/wto-multilateral-affairs/wto-doha-negotiations/rulesnegotiations/trade-remedies.
  • 6See TN/RL/W/78, 19 March 2003.
  • 7TN/RL/W/78, 19 March 2003.
  • 8TN/RL/W/98, 6 May 2003.
  • 9TN/RL/GEN/129, 24 April 2006.
  • 10TN/RL/W/78, 19 March 2003.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部