期刊文献+

遗忘型轻度认知损害的神经影像与神经心理特点 被引量:1

Characteristics of neuroimaging and neuropsychological in amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解aMCI脑结构改变和相关认知损害特点,探讨准确诊断aMCI的神经影像和神经心理生物指标。方法 3-DMRI采集35例aMCI患者和35名健康对照者脑结构信息,LEAP软件计算左右侧和均侧海马、杏仁核和颞角体积,MoCA测评认知功能。结果两组被试年龄、性别差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),受教育年限差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。aMCI的左、右侧及均侧海马萎缩和右侧颞角扩大(P〈0.05),MoCA总评分和注意力、重复句子、抽象能力、延迟回忆、定向力等亚项得分减低(P〈0.05),MoCA与右、均侧海马及右侧杏仁核呈正相关(P〈0.05)。ROC分析显示Mo—cA总评分、左、右及均侧海马、左、右及均侧杏仁核等指标诊断aMCI准确性高(P〈0.01)。单独认知指标MoCA总评分和重复句子(wilks’Lambda=0.299,X^2=80.905,df=2,P〈0.01)区分aMCI和NC的准确性为88.6%,单独脑结构指标均侧海马和杏仁核(wilks’Lambda=0.515,X^244.509,df=2,P〈0.01)的准确性为81.4%,认知和脑结构综合指标MoCA总评分、均侧海马和左侧杏仁核(Wilks’Lambda=0.261,X^2=89.228,df=3,P〈0.01)的准确性为95.7%。结论 aMCI期已出现特异的海马、杏仁核萎缩和弥漫性认知损害,在AD非痴呆期联合应用认知测试和神经影像指标更有助于AD早期准确诊断。 Objective To understand the brain structure changes and associated cognitive impairment characteristics in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and to discuss the diagnostic value of neuroimaging and neuropsychologica[ biomarkers for aMCI. Methods Totals of 35 cases of aMCI patients and 35 healthy subjects were chosen in Shanghai community-dwelling older adults from China Longitudinal Aging Study. 3-D MRI data acquisition for brain structure information was used to calculate left and right side and mean volume of hippocampus, amygdala and temporal angle by using Learning embeddings atlas propagation (LEAP). MoCA was used to assess cognitive function. Results No significant differences in age and gender were observed among the two groups (P〉 0.05), however, education was statistically significant difference (P 〈0.01). Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the NC group performed better than the patients with aMCI in most of the cognitive domains, including MoCA, attention, repeating sentences, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation (P 〈 0.05). The aMCI showed volume loss in left, right and mean hippocampus, and right temporal angle (P 〈0.05). MoCA scores were correlated with right and mean hippocampus (P 〈 0.05), and right amygdala (P〈0.05). ROC analysis showed that MoCA, left, right and mean hippocampus, and amygdale had high diagnostic accuracy for aMCI (P〈 0.01). For cognitive measures, Wilks' Lambda stepwise discriminant analysis showed that MoCA and repeating sentence achieved a classification accuracy of 88.6% (Wilks' Lambda= 0. 299, )X^2 = 80. 905 ,df = 2, P〈0. 01). For brain structure, mean hip- pocampus and amygdala was 81.4M (Wilks' Lambda=0. 515, X^2 = 44. 509,df = 2,P〈0. 01). Furthermore, mean hippocampus and left amygdala, combined to MoCA, achieved a classification accuracy of 95.7%(Wilks' Lambda=0. 261, X^2= 89. 228,df = 3,P〈 0.01). Conclusions Hippocampus and amygdala atrophy, and cognitive impairment have specific value for identifying aMCI stage. Combining two classes of measures for the early detection of MCI provides more accurate biomarkers than those based on neuroimaging or cognitive measures alone.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2014年第4期344-348,共5页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基金 基金项目:国家科技支撑计划课题项目(2009BA177803) 国家自然科技基金重大国际(地区)合作研究项目(61210001) 国家临床重点专科建设(2011-873,OMA-MH)
关键词 遗忘型轻度认知损害 核磁共振成像 蒙特利尔认知评估 Amnestic mild cognitive impairment MRI Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Jia J, Zhou A, Wei C,et al. The prevalence of mild cognitiveimpairment and its etiological subtypes in elderly Chinese[J].Alzheimers Dement,2014,10(4) ;439 -447.
  • 2Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity[J]. J Intern Med,2004,256(3) : 183 -194.
  • 3Busse A, Hensel A,Guhne U,et al. Mild cognitive impair-ment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes[J]. Neurol-ogy,2006,67(12) :2 176-2 185.
  • 4Fischer P, Jungwirth S,Zehetmayer S,et al. Conversionfrom subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer de-mentia[J]. Neurology,2007 ,68(4) : 288 -291.
  • 5Rountree SD, Waring SC, Chan WC,et al. Importance ofsubtle amnestic and nonamnestic deficits in mild cognitive im-pairment: prognosis and conversion to dementia [J]. DementGeriatr Cogn Disord,2007 ,24(6) :476 -482.
  • 6Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive im-pairment :clinical characterization and outcome[J]. Arch Neu-rol,1999,56(3):303-308.
  • 7肖世富,徐巍,姚培芬,张明园.世界卫生组织老年认知功能评价成套神经心理测验的临床初步应用[J].中华精神科杂志,1999,32(4):230-232. 被引量:63
  • 8Lawton MP,Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrument activities of daily living[J]. Ger-ontologist, 1969,9(3) : 179-186.
  • 9张明园.精神科量表评定手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1993:165-167.
  • 10钱时兴,肖世富,张新凯,李霞,朱敏捷,王涛,王海红.日常生活功能量表评定阿尔茨海默病患者日常生活功能的信度与效度及其应用[J].上海精神医学,2010,22(1):22-25. 被引量:37

二级参考文献66

  • 1李格,沈漁邨,陈昌惠,李淑然,赵友文,刘棉,许亮,王兰香,王勤.老年痴呆简易测试方法研究——MMSE 在城市老年居民中的测试[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1988,2(1):13-18. 被引量:139
  • 2何江,桂俊豪,余伍忠,张宇红,仇东辉,徐江涛,宋永斌.MMSE、HIS、ADL在阿尔茨海默病筛查中的应用[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2005,13(7):28-30. 被引量:30
  • 3张明园,Yu.,E.痴呆的流行病学调查工具及其应用[J].上海精神医学,1995,7(A01):1-62. 被引量:161
  • 4胡洪涛,张振馨,姚景莉,余慧贞,王荫华,汤洪川,冀成君,徐涛.盐酸美金刚治疗阿尔茨海默病多中心随机对照临床试验[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(4):277-280. 被引量:29
  • 5刘平 于欣 汪向东 等译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类(研究用诊断标准)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.31-47.
  • 6张明园.精神科量表评定手册.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1993:165-167.
  • 7Zhang MY, Katzman R, Salmon D, et al. The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Shanghai, China : impact of age, gender, and education. Am Neurol, 1990, 27(4) : 428 -437.
  • 8Fabrigoule C, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, et al. Social and leisure activities and risk of dementia: a prospective longitudinal study. Am Geriat Society, 1995, 43(5): 485-490.
  • 9Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrument activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 1969, 9 (3) :179 -186.
  • 10Meguro K, Ishii H, Yamaguchi S, et al. Prevalence and cognitive performances of clinical dementia rating 0. 5 and mild cognitive impairment in Japan: the Tajiri project. Alzheimcr Dis Assoc Disord, 2004, 18(1): 3-10.

共引文献206

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部