摘要
目的:探讨复合靶控输注(TCI)氯胺酮抑制气道高反应性(AHR)患者全身麻醉插管所需的半数有效效应室浓度(EC50)。方法:选择合并AHR的择期手术患者60例为研究对象,随机分为试验组(A组)和对照组(N组),每组30例。N组采用TCI异丙酚[效应室靶控浓度(Ce)3.0μg/ml]和瑞芬太尼(Ce 3.1 ng/ml),静脉滴注维库溴铵0.1 mg/kg等全身麻醉诱导插管;A组在N组的基础上复合TCI氯胺酮全身麻醉诱导插管,观察两组患者气管插管期间气道压(Paw)的变化等情况。结果:两组患者Paw、气管插管后2 min(T2)SBP和SpO2、气管插管后3 min(T3)ETCO2和SpO2比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),其余各时点数据比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:AHR患者在缓解期间行全身麻醉插管时,TCI氯胺酮抑制AHR所需的半数有效效应室浓度EC50为1.13μg/ml,95%可信区间(CI)为0.97-1.28μg/ml。
Objective To investigate the median effective target effect-site concentration(EC50)of Ketamine required for inhibitining intubation-induced airway hyperresponsiveness( AHR)in patients. Method 60 patients undergoing elective Operation with airway hyper-responsiveness were divided into A and N groups,with 30 patients per group. N group adopted the target effect-site concentration( Ce)of propofol(3. 0μg/ml)and remifentanil(3. 1 ng/ml)target-controlled infusion and iv injection of vecuronium 0. 1 mg/kg. Tracheal intuba-tion was performed after the Ce and Cp were balanced. A group adopted the raised process of initial target plasma concentration of drug ( Cp)of ketamine was set at 1. 0μg/ml. Comparisons were conducted on the airway hyperresponsiveness the two groups,etc. Results There was significant difference on the Paw between the two groups(P﹤0. 05). on the time T2,the levels of SBP was significantly higher in group N than that of group A(P﹤0. 05). on the time T2 and T3,the levels of Spo2 was significantly lower in group N than that of group A(P﹤0. 05). on the time T3,the levels of ETCO2 was significantly higher in group N than that of group A(P﹤0. 05). There were not significant difference in other data between the two groups( P﹥0. 05). Conclusion In remission stage,the EC50 of ketamine inhibiting AHR to tra-cheal intubation in patients is 1. 13 μg/ml,95% confidence interval are 0. 97~1. 28 μg/ml.
出处
《吉林医学》
CAS
2014年第25期5568-5571,共4页
Jilin Medical Journal