期刊文献+

Current status of full-endoscopic techniques in the surgical treatment of disk herniations and Spinal Canal stenosis 被引量:3

Current status of full-endoscopic techniques in the surgical treatment of disk herniations and spinal canal stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 Degenerative constrictions of the spinal canal with compression of neural elements arise as a result of bony,disk,capsular or ligament structures.The most frequent causes are disk herniations and spinal stenoses.The lumbar and cervical spine is the most prominent cause.After conservative treatments have been exhausted,surgical intervention may be necessary.Today,microsurgical or microscopically-assisted decompression is regarded as the standard procedure for disk herniation and spinal stenosis in the lumbar region,while in the cervical spine,microsurgical or microscopically-assisted anterior decompression and fusion are standard.Both procedures demonstrate good clinical results but present problems associated with the operation.Decompressions in the area of the spine must be carried out under continuous visualization and must entail the possibility of adequate bone resection.Taking this into account,completely new endoscopes and instrument sets has been developed for full-endoscopic operations in tandem with the development of the lateral transforaminal and interlaminar approaches for the lumbar spine and the posterior,contralateral and anterior approaches for the cervical spine.The possibilities and results of comparable and established standard procedures have been used as a benchmark in the course of clinical validation.The development of surgically created approaches and the new rod lens endoscopes combined with appropriate instrument sets have laid the technical foundations for full-endoscopic operation in the lumbar spine on all primary and recurrent disk herniations inside and outside the spinal canal and on spinal stenoses.This development has also permitted resection of soft disk herniations in the cervical spine.The use of the relevant approaches depends on anatomical and pathological inclusion and exclusion criteria.The clinical results of standard procedures are achieved,which must be regarded as a minimum criterion for the introduction of new technologies.On the basis of evidence-based medicine(EBM) criteria,it can be established that using the full-endoscopic techniques developed,adequate decompression is achieved in the defined indications with reduced traumatization,improved visibility conditions and positive cost benefits.Today,fullendoscopic operations may be regarded as an expansion and alternative within the overall concept of spinal surgery. Degenerative constrictions of the spinal canal with compression of neural elements arise as a result of bony, disk, capsular or ligament structures. The most frequent causes are disk herniations and spinal stenoses. The lumbar and cervical spine is the most prominent cause. After conservative treatments have been exhausted, surgical intervention may be necessary. Today, microsurgical or microscopically-assisted decompression is regarded as the standard procedure for disk herniation and spinal stenosis in the lumbar region, while in the cervical spine, microsurgical or microscopically-assisted anterior decompression and fusion are standard. Both procedures demonstrate good clinical results but present problems associated with the operation. Decompressions in the area of the spine must be carried out under continuous visualization and must entail the possibility of adequate bone resection. Taking this into account, completely new endoscopes and instrument sets has been developed for full-endoscopic operations in tandem with the development of the lateral transforaminal and interlaminar approaches for the lumbar spine and the posterior, contralateral and anterior approaches for the cervical spine. The possibilities and results of comparable and established standard procedures have been used as a benchmark in the course of clinical validation. The development of surgically created approaches and the new rod lens endoscopes combined with appropriate instrument sets have laid the technical foundations for full-endoscopic operation in the lumbar spine on all primary and recurrent disk herniations inside and outside the spinal canal and on spinal stenoses. This development has also permitted resection of soft disk herniations in the cervical spine. The use of the relevant approaches depends on anatomical and pathological inclusion and exclusion criteria. The clinical results of standard procedures are achieved, which must be regarded as a minimum criterion for the introduction of new technologies. On the basis of evidence-based medicine ( EBM ) criteria, it can be established that using the full-endoscopic techniques developed, adequate decompression is achieved in the deifned indications with reduced traumatization, improved visibility conditions and positive cost beneifts. Today, full-endoscopic operations may be regarded as an expansion and alternative within the overall concept of spinal surgery.
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2014年第8期571-584,共14页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
关键词 Intervertebral disc displacement Surgical procedures minimally invasive Spinal stenosis Spinal diseases Intervertebral disc displacement Surgical procedures, minimally invasive Spinal stenosis Spinal diseases
  • 相关文献

同被引文献45

  • 1郭功亮,齐兵,曲阳,赵宝林.关节突关节切除范围对下颈椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].生物医学工程研究,2010,29(4):259-262. 被引量:20
  • 2Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. A new full - endoscop- ic techniquefor cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc her - niations using 6.9mm endo- scopes : prospective 2 - year results of 87 patients [ J ]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2007,50 (4) : 219 - 226.
  • 3Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Full - endoscopic cer- vical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateraldisc herniations using 5.9 - mm endoscopes: a prospec- tive, randomized, controlled study [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2008,33 (9) : 940 - 948.
  • 4Kim C H, hung C K, Kim H J, et al. Early outcome of pos- terior cervical endoscopic discectomy:an alternative treat- ment choice for physically socially active patients [ J ]. J Korean Med Sci,2009,24 (2) :302 - 306.
  • 5Komotar R J, Mocco J, Kaiser M G. Surgeical management of cervical myelopathy :indications and techniques for laminectomy and fusion [ J ]. Spine J, 2006,6 ( Suppl ) : 2523 - 2675.
  • 6Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, et al. Treatment of cervical OPLL by cervical anterior fusion using autologous vertebral bone grafts [ J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2009, 151 ( 11 ) : 1549 - 1555.
  • 7Tzaan W C. Anterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical disceetomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation: Outcome, complications, and technique [ J ]. J spinal Dis- ord Tech,2011,24(7) :421 -431.
  • 8Watters W C, Levinthal R. Anterior cervical disetomy with and without fusion: Results, comp - lication and long - term follow - up [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1994,19 (22) :2343 - 2347.
  • 9Yang J S,Chen L, Deng Z L, et al. Anterior or posterior approach of full - endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation? A Comparative Cohort study [ J 1- Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39 (21) :1743 - 1750.
  • 10周跃.经皮椎间孔内窥镜技术的现状与未来[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(5):326-328. 被引量:83

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部