期刊文献+

不同时期中国非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床特征与预后 被引量:13

Clinical characteristics and prognosis comparison of Chinese non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients in two different time periods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较分析不同时期中国非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的临床特征、治疗方式及预后,了解时代变化对患者人群特点和治疗效果的影响.方法 两组病例来自不同时期的两个国际大规模NSTE-ACS临床试验中所有接受冠状动脉造影的中国患者.共入选1 473例NSTE-ACS患者,其中749例来自1999年4月至2000年12月我国38个中心开展的组织评估缺血综合征策略登记(OASIS)研究(OASIS组);另724例者来自2007年4月至2008年6月我国24个中心参与的对比NSTE-ACS治疗的国际随机研究(TIMACS组).随访时间均为患者入选之日起的180 d.比较其临床特征、治疗方式及预后.结果 与OASIS组比较,TIMACS组的患者年龄较大[(64.2±10.1)岁比(58.7±10.2)岁],男性比例较少[66.3%(480/724)比74.4%(557/749)],入院时血压较低,有较多的既往介入治疗史[9.4%(68/724)比6.4%(48/749)]、卒中史]8.8% (64/724)比5.1%(38/749)]、高血压史[62.8% (455/724)比56.6%(424/749)]和糖尿病史[23.3%(169/724)比16.2%(121/749)]的患者,而冠心病史]37.4%(271/724)比59.1%(443/749)]和心肌梗死史[12.0%(87/724)比27.6% (207/749)]的患者所占比例较低(P均<0.05).住院期间TIMACS组PCI治疗比例较高[74.9%(524/724)比49.3%(369/749),P<0.001].住院期间,出院带药和180 d随访时TIMACS研究在冠心病二级预防药物[β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和(或)血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ACEI/ARB)、调脂药等]应用比例及患者的依从性明显高于OASIS组(P均<0.05).180 d随访时TIMACS组联合终点事件发生率明显低于OASIS组[13.3%(96/724)比25.2%(189/749),P<0.001],特别是顽固性心绞痛[5.2%(38/724)比22.6%(169/749),P<0.001]明显减少.应用Cox回归模型对基线水平和住院期间相关治疗进行校正后,TIMACS组发生联合终点事件(HR =0.39,95%CI:0.29~0.53,P<0.001)和顽固性心绞痛或心绞痛再入院事件(HR =0.17,95%CI:0.11 ~0.25,P<0.001)的风险降低.结论 TIMACS研究的患者在PCI治疗、冠心病二级预防等方面优于OASIS研究,180 d随访的联合终点事件发生明显少于后者.提示随着国内外指南的更新和临床诊治水平的提高,中国在NSTE-ACS治疗方面有明显的进步. Objective To compare the clinical characteristics,treatment methods and outcomes in Chinese non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients from two large clinical trials in different time periods.Methods All Chinese NSTE-ACS patients from two large International clinical trials (OASIS Registry and TIMACS) underwent coronary artery angiography after first admission were recruited in our analysis.The follow-up time was 180 days.A total of 1 473 NSTE-ACS patients were recruited in this analysis,in which 749 from Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS REISTRY) that completed in 38 centers in China from April 1999 to December 2000,and the rest 724 patients from The Timing of Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes (TIMACS) trial in 24 centers in China performed from April 2007 to June 2008.Results Compared to OASIS patients,TIMACS group were older ((64.2 ± 10.1) years old vs.(58.7 ± 10.2) years old),and fewer male patients (66.3% (480/724) vs.74.4% (557/749)),lower blood pressure at admission,and more histories of previous PCI (9.4% (68/724 vs.6.4% (48/749)),stroke (8.8% (64/724) vs.5.1% (38/749)),hypertension (62.8% (455/724) vs.56.6% (424/749)) and diabetes (23.3% (169/724) vs.16.2% (121/749)),lower histories of coronary artery disease (37.4% (271/724) vs.59.1% (443/749)) and myocardial infarction (12.0% (87/724) vs.27.6% (207/749)) (all P < 0.05).After admission,comparing to OASIS group,TIMACS patients had significant higher PCI proportion (74.9% (524/724) vs.49.3% (369/749),P < 0.001).In addition,for secondary prevention,TIMACS patients had significant higher standard medication treatment proportion during hospitalization,at discharge and at 180 days follow up than OASIS group (P < 0.05 for β-blocker,ACEI/ARB and lipid lowering drugs) and higher compliance rate.The combined primary outcome event rate at 180 days was much lower in TIMACS than in OASIS patients (13.3% (96/724) vs.25.2% (189/749),P <0.001) mostly due to the reduction on the refractory angina (5.2% (38/724) vs.22.6% (169/749),P < 0.001).Results of COX regression model adjusted for baseline levels and treatment during hospitalization showed that the incidence rate of combination endpoint (HR =0.39,95% CI:0.29-0.53,P < 0.001) and refractory ischemia/angina rehospitalization (HR =0.17,95% CI:0.11-0.25,P < 0.001) were both lower in TIMACS patients than in OASIS patients.Conclusion PCI procedure and secondary prevention medication administration are more often applied in TIMACS patients than in OASIS group,which is related to less integrated incidence of primary outcomes reflecting progress in Chinese medical care for non ST elevated acute coronary syndrome patients according to the updated guidelines.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期655-660,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 药物疗法 治疗结果 Coronary disease Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary Drug therapy Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Steg PG,Goldberg RJ,Gore JM,et al.Baseline characteristics,management practices,and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE)[J].Am J Cardiol,2002,90:358-363.
  • 2Mandelzweig L,Battler A,Boyko V,et al.The second Euro Heart Survey on acute coronary syndromes:Characteristics,treatment,and outcome of patients with ACS in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin in 2004[J].Eur Heart J,2006,27:2285-2293.
  • 3Terkelsen CJ,Lassen JF,Ncrgaard BL,et al.Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs.non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction:observations from an unselected cohort[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26:18-26.
  • 4Jneid H,Anderson JL,Wright RS,et al.2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update):a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2012,60:645-681.
  • 5Hamm CW,Bassand JP,Agewall S,et al.ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J].G Ital Cardiol (Rome),2012,13:171-228.
  • 6中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38:675-690.
  • 7梁岩,朱俊,谭慧琼,章晏,刘力生,无.中国非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者二年随访终点事件的影响因素分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2009,37(7):580-584. 被引量:8
  • 8张峻,乔树宾,朱俊.不同时间窗干预非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征疗效观察[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(10):865-869. 被引量:7
  • 9Bagai A,White JA,Lokhnygina Y,et al.Routine early eptifibatide versus delayed provisional use at percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes patients:an analysis from the Early Glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲ a Inhibition in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome trial[J].Am Heart J,2013,166:466-473.
  • 10Chatterjee S,Chaudhuri D,Vedanthan R,et al.Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome--a meta-analysis of randomized trials[J].Int J Cardiol,2013,168:915-921.

二级参考文献31

  • 1谭慧琼,朱俊,梁岩,章晏,刘力生,代表OASIS登记试验中国地区协作组.非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征二年随访[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(3):184-188. 被引量:12
  • 2OASIS协作组,梁岩,谭慧琼,朱俊,章晏,刘力生.我国非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者猝死或心律失常死亡事件危险因素分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(3):142-145. 被引量:10
  • 3Piegns LS,Flather M,Pogue J,et al.The Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS) registry in patients with unstable angina.Am J Cardiol,1999,84:7M-12M.
  • 4Prabhakaran D,Yusuf S,Mehts S,et al.Two-year outcomes in patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome:results of the OASIS registry 1 and 2.Indian Heart J,2.005,57:217-225.
  • 5Newby LK,Bhapkar MV,White HD,et al.Predictors of 90-day outcome in patients stabilized after acute coronary syndromes.EtaHeart J,2003,24:172-181.
  • 6Anderson JL,Adams CD,Amman EM,et al.ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/nonST-Elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-STElevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiegraphy and Interventions,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.J Am Coll Canliol.2007,50:e1-e157.
  • 7Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology,Bassand JP,Harem CW,et al.Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.Eur Heart J,2007,28:1598-1660.
  • 8Fox KA,Mehts SR,Peters R,et al.Benefits and risks of the combination of elopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome:the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial.Circulation,2004,110:1202-1208.
  • 9Cohen M,Mahaffey KW,Pieper K,et al.A subgroup analysis of the impact of prerandomization antithrombin therapy on outcomes in the SYNERGY trial:enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,48:1346-1354.
  • 10The SYNERGY Executive Committee.Superior Yield of the New strategy of Enoxaparin,Revasculatization and Glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors.The SYNERGY trial:study design and rationale.Am Heart J,2002,143:952-960.

共引文献14

同被引文献90

  • 1夏继辉,申仕海,夏文胜.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对校正QT离散度的影响[J].实用心电学杂志,2006,15(3):225-225. 被引量:1
  • 2陈灏珠.内科学[M]第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995..
  • 3ACS-PCI患者肾功能状态调查协作组,霍勇,何华.急性冠状动脉综合征接受介入治疗患者肾功能状态多中心注册研究[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(6):624-629. 被引量:31
  • 4Maasrani M,Drochon A,Harmouche M,et al.Theoretical study of the flow rate toward the right heart territory in case of total occlusion of the right coronary artery[J].Med Eng Phys,2013,35(1):103-107.
  • 5Xia J,Yi L,Liu N,et al.Human plasma metabolic profiles of coronary heart disease by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with monte carlo tree approach[J].Analytical Letters,2012,45(13/15):2 185-2 197.
  • 6Donna Giri U,Acharya R,Martis RJ,et al.Automated diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease affected patients using LDA,PCA,ICA and Discrete Wavelet Transform[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,37:274-282.
  • 7Chung E,Corbett JR,Moran JM,et al.Is there a dose-response relationship for heart disease with lowdose radiation therapy[J]?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2013,85(4):959-964.
  • 8Thompson PL.Acute coronary syndromes:much progress, new challenges[J].Clin Ther, 2013,35 (8) : 1054-1057.
  • 9Kosuge M,Ebina T, Hibi K,et al.Differences in negative T waves between acute pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome[J].Circ J, 2014,78 (2) : 483 -489.
  • 10王梅芳,杨林花,杨晓玲,张睿娟,侯丽虹,刘秀娥.炎症标志物及凝血因子与深静脉血栓形成的相关性研究[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2010,18(3):753-756. 被引量:16

引证文献13

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部