摘要
目的:探讨肝硬化患者脑常规和扩散加权( DWI )磁共振成像( MRI )与门静脉高压测量参数之间的相关性。方法回顾分析南京军区南京总医院2009年6月至2014年5月275例肝硬化患者行脑MR检查;计算苍白球指数( GPI),测量双侧顶叶白质、额叶白质、枕叶白质、尾状核头、壳核、苍白球和丘脑的表观扩散系数( ADC);在CT图像测量肝脏体积、门静脉和侧支循环的最大管径值。独立样本t检验用于比较有无T1 WI苍白球高信号组之间以及1.5T和3.0T MR之间GPI之间的差异;采用单因素方差分析按照Child-Pugh分级进行分析;采用配对样本t检验分析比较随访病例前后两次脑MR检查的GPI值;采用Pearson相关检验分析GPI、脑各部位ADC值与门静脉管径、肝脏体积、侧支循环管径及静脉血氨值之间的相关性;采用Spearman等级相关检验分析GPI、各部位ADC值与Child-Pugh分级之间的相关性。结果(1)肝硬化患者T1WI苍白球高信号组的GPI显著高于无高信号组患者(0.128±0.031比0.057±0.021,t=22.244,P<0.01);两组间脑各部位ADC值及静脉血氨值差异无统计学意义;苍白球高信号组的门静脉管径、侧支循环管径明显大于无高信号组[(18±4) mm 比(17±3) mm、(10±6) mm 比(6±4) mm,t 值分别为2.816、5.048,P 值分别为0.005、<0.01];高信号组的肝脏体积明显小于无高信号组[(1113±445)ml比(14443±698)ml,t=-4.280,P<0.01];不同Child-Pugh分级组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(2)1.5T和3.0T MR的肝硬化患者GPI差异有统计学意义(t=-5.15,P<0.01);短期随访患者的GPI差异无统计学意义(t=-0.271,P=0.788);(3)GPI与肝脏体积呈负相关(r=-0.240,P<0.01),与门静脉管径和侧支循环管径呈正相关(r值分别为0.296、0.355;均P<0.01);顶叶、额叶、尾状核、苍白球和枕叶的ADC值与GPI呈正相关( r值分别为0.309、0.156、0.174、0.155、0.185;均P<0.05);顶叶的ADC值与门静脉管径呈正相关(r=0.187,P=0.025);其他部位ADC值与门静脉高压测量参数之间无显著相关性(均P>0.05);GPI、丘脑ADC值与Child-Pugh 分级间呈正相关( r值分别为0.195、0.217,均P<0.05),其余部位ADC值与Child-Pugh分级间无显著相关性(均P>0.05)。结论肝硬化患者GPI与门静脉高压严重程度有关,且与ADC值呈正相关,但ADC值的改变与门静脉高压关系不大,静脉血氨值和Child-Pugh分级对于GPI和ADC值改变影响不大。
Objective To explore the relationship among brain routine magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) , diffusion weight imaging ( DWI ) , and parameters of portal hypertension of cirrhosis patients.Methods Two hundred and seventy-five patients with cirrhosis underwent routine MRI exams were analyzed retrospectively.Signal intensities of putamen and globus pallidus ( GP) were measured on T 1 WI to compute globus pallidus index (GPI).In apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images, regions of interest (ROIs)were placed on the white matter of parietal lobe , frontal lobe, occipital lobe, caudate head, putamen, GP, and thalamus to get ADC values of each location.In abdomen CT images , liver areas of all slices were drawn to multiply slice thickness to get liver volumes , and maximum portal venous caliber and portosystemic shunting collateral caliber were recorded.Independent-samples t test was performed to explore the significance of GPI between GP hyperintensity group and GP non-hyperintensity group , as well as between cirrhosis groups underwent 1.5T and 3.0T MR exams.One-way ANOVA test was performed to evaluate differences among Child-Pugh classes.The difference between baseline and follow-up MR exams were compared with paired-samples t test.Pearson correlation test was performed to explore the relationships among GPI, ADC values, parameters of portal hypertension , and venous blood ammonia levels.Spearman rank correlation test was performed to explore the relationships among GPI , ADC values, and Child-Pugh classes.Results ( 1 ) The GPI in GP hyperintensity group was significantly higher than GP non-hyperintensity group (0.128 ±0.031 vs 0.057 ±0.021,t =22.244, P〈0.01).The ADC values and venous blood ammonia levels showed no significant difference between two groups .GP hyperintensity group showed larger portal venous and collateral calibers than GP non-hyperintensity group ((18±4)mm vs (17 ±3)mm,(10±6) mm vs (6 ±4) mm,t was 2.816 and 5.048 respectively; P was 0.005 and〈0.01 respectively).GP hyperintensity group showed less liver volumes than the other group ((1 113±445)ml vs (14 443 ±698) ml,t=-4.280, P〈0.01).Child-Pugh classes showed no significant difference among each other (all P〉0.05).(2)The GPI of 1.5T and 3.0T exams showed significant difference between each other (t=-5.15, P〈0.01).Short-term follow-up patients showed no significant difference of GPI between two exams (t=-0.271, P=0.788).(3)GPI showed negative correlation with liver volumes of cirrhosis patients ( r =-0.240;P 〈0.01 ) , and GPI positively correlated with portal venous calibers and portosystemic shunting collateral calibers ( r=0.296, 0.355;both P〈0.01).ADC values of parietal lobe , frontal lobe, caudate head, GP, and occipital lobe positively correlated with GPI ( r =0.309, 0.156, 0.174, 0.155, 0.185;all P〉0.05).ADC values of parietal lobe positively correlated with portal venous calibers (r=0.187, P =0.025), ADC values of other locations showed no significant correlation with parameters of portal hypertension (all P〉0.05).GPI and thalamus ADC values showed positive correlation with Child-Pugh classes ( r=0.195 and 0.217;both P〈0.05 ) , ADC values of other locations showed no significant correlation with Child-Pugh classes (all P〉0.05).Conclusions The GPI of cirrhosis patients was correlated with severity of portal hypertension , and showed significant correlation with ADC values , while ADC values had no relationship with portal hypertension.Besides , venous blood ammonia values and Child-Pugh classes have little effect on GPI and ADC values.
出处
《中华医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第32期2495-2500,共6页
National Medical Journal of China
基金
国家自然科学基金(81322020、81230032、81171313、81301209)
教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-12-0260)
关键词
肝硬化
磁共振成像
弥散
高血压
门静脉
Liver cirrhosis
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Hypertension,portal