摘要
目的:观察负压封闭引流( VSD)治疗胸腰椎病变术后切口感染的临床疗效。方法对54例胸腰椎病变术后切口感染患者分别采用置管冲洗引流(对照组,23例)和VSD( VSD组,31例)治疗。比较两组抗生素应用时间、创口局部治疗时间、引流管阻塞情况,创口愈合情况,观察VSD副反应,评估VSD的疗效。结果54例患者均获随访,时间6~5个月。抗生素应用时间:对照组(20.1±5.6)d,VSD组(14.1±2.1)d;创口局部治疗时间:对照组(25.2±6.2)d,VSD组(15.0±4.6)d;引流管阻塞次数:对照组13次(13/33),VSD组11次(11/81);创口愈合情况:对照组15例(15/23),VSD组29例(29/31)。两组上述指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 VSD组出现皮肤发红、发痒5例,皮疹3例。结论 VSD治疗胸腰椎病变术后切口感染能缩短感染伤口治疗时间,促进创口愈合。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage ( VSD) in the treatment of postop-erative wound infection of thoracolumbar vertebral body disease. Methods 54 cases with postoperative incisional in-fection of thoracic lumbar spine surgery were respectively treated by irrigation-suction(control group,23cases)and VSD(VSD group,31cases). The antibiotics applying time, the wound treatment time, drainage tube blockage situa-tion, the wound healing situation, VSD side reaction and other indexes were compared and retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of VSD. Results 54 cases were followed up for 6~15 months. The antibiotics treatment time (20. 1 ± 5. 6)d in control group and(14. 1 ± 2. 1)d in VSD group, the tresis vulnus treatment time(25. 2 ± 6. 2)d in control group and(15. 0 ± 4. 6) d in VSD group, drainage tube blockage 13 times(13/33) in control group and 11 times(11/81)in VSD group, tresis vulnus was healed in 15 cases (15/23) in control group and 29 cases(29/31) in VSD group. These differences had statistical significance ( P 〈0. 05 ) . VSD group had 5 cases of skin redness and tickle, 3 cases of rash. Conclusions VSD can effectively shorten the wound infection treatment time and promote wound healing in the treatment of postoperative wound infection of thoracolumbar vertebral body disease.
出处
《临床骨科杂志》
2014年第4期390-392,395,共4页
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词
负压封闭引流
胸腰椎病变
切口感染
vacuum sealing drainage
thoracolumbar vertebral body disease
infection of incisional wound