期刊文献+

投资偏好与“特质波动率之谜”——以中国股票市场A股为研究对象 被引量:37

Investment Preference and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle——Evidence from China Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 与价格走势平平的股票相比,投资者更愿意选择过去价格变化幅度较大的股票。这种投资偏好是否是产生"特质波动率之谜"的原因呢?本文以中国股票市场A股为研究对象,首先验证中国股票市场"特质波动率之谜"的存在性。随后组合分析和Fama-MacBeth横截面回归分析发现,价格极差可以在一定程度上解释但不能完全解释"特质波动率之谜"。横截面回归结果表明,在价格极差、最大日收益率、换手率三者的共同作用下,特质波动率与股票预期收益之间的负向关系不再显著。由此,对某些特殊股票的投资偏好可能是产生"特质波动率之谜"的主要原因。 There is evidence that investors have stocks with flat price variation. Whether such a preference for stocks with large price variation rather than an investment preference causes the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle.'? In this paper, the existence of the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in China stock market is firstly ex- amined. Then, portfolio analyses and Fama-MaeBeth cross-sectional regression analyses both show that, the range of prices can explain to some extent, but not fully explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. Cross-seetional regression results show that, under the joint effect of the range of prices, the maximum daily return and turnover, the negative relation between the idiosyncratic volatility and expected stock re- turns is no longer statistically signifieant. Thus, the investment preference for some special stocks may be the main cause to produce the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期10-20,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71371113) 教育部人文社科研究项目(13YJA790154) 山西省软科学研究项目(2013041024-02) 山西省研究生优秀创新项目(20123004)
关键词 资产定价 特质风险 投资偏好 价格极差 asset pricing idiosyncratic risk investment preference range of prices
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1French K, Poterba J. Investor diversification and international equity markets[J]. American Economic Review, 1991, 81(2): 222-226.
  • 2Daniel K, Titman S. Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 55: 1-33.
  • 3Cohen L. Loyalty-based portfolio choice[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(3): 1213-1245.
  • 4Hong H, Kacperczyk M. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(1): 15-36.
  • 5Hong H, Kostovetsky L. Red and blue investing: Values and finance[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 103: 1-19.
  • 6Kumar A.Who gambles in the stock market?[J]. Journal of Finance,2009, 64(4): 1889-1933.
  • 7Bali T G, Cakici N, Whitelaw R F. Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 99: 427-446.
  • 8Levy H. Equilibrium in animperfect market: A constraint on the number of securities in the portfolio[J]. American Economic Review, 1978, 68: 643-658.
  • 9Merton R. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987, 42(3): 483-510.
  • 10Campbell J, Lettau M, Malkiel B, et al. Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk[J]. Journal of Finance, 2001, 56(1): 1-43.

二级参考文献142

共引文献194

同被引文献347

引证文献37

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部