期刊文献+

汉语口语中强烈异议表达的语用研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 以往对于汉语异议表达的研究大多是基于交际双方的相对权势和社会距离。本文以现代汉语交际中一些真实语料为例,结合具体的语境,从地位平等的会话者角度出发,探讨了在言语交际中的强烈异议表达作为一种维护面子和关系的策略的使用。研究发现,强烈异议表达在交际中有时并没有产生负面影响,反而可以起到维护对方面子、建立良好关系、促进交际顺利进行的目的。
作者 胡彤
出处 《牡丹江大学学报》 2014年第8期116-118,共3页 Journal of Mudanjiang University
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kakav, Christina, ( 2004 ), Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Conversations and Classroom Discourse [D]. In Power and Politeness in Action. Locher, Miriam. Disagreement in Oral Communication [M]. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 2Pomerantz,Anita,(1984),Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Atkinson, J.M., Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57-101.
  • 3余东明.什么是语用学[M].上海;上海外语教育出版社,2011.
  • 4冉永平.语用学:现象与分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 5夏玉琼,崔义平.异议表达的语用策略研究[J].宜宾学院学报,2008,8(11):80-82. 被引量:8
  • 6庄美英.缓和性冲突回应——针对冒犯性话语的语用策略分析[J].当代外语研究,2012(7):33-37. 被引量:17
  • 7Goodwin,Marjorie, Goodwin,Charles, Yaeger- Dror, Maleah,(2002),Multi-modality in girls' game disputes. Journal ofPragmaties [M] 34 (10-11), 1621-1649.

二级参考文献23

  • 1曲卫国,陈流芳.论传统的中国礼貌原则[J].学术月刊,1999,31(7):33-41. 被引量:39
  • 2夏玉琼,韦汉.《实话实说》节目中模糊限制语的维护面子功能[J].暨南大学华文学院学报,2005(1):68-73. 被引量:9
  • 3Kakava,Christina.Negotiahon of Disagreement by Greeks in Conver-sations and Classroom Discourse[D].In Power and Politeness in Action.Lee-her.Mlriam.Disagreement in Oral Communlcataon[M].New York:Mouton deGruyter.2004.
  • 4Waldron,Vincent R and James L,Applegate Interpersonal construct differentiation and conversational planning:an examination of two eognihve ac-countsforthe produetiou ofcompetent verbal disagreementtactics[J].Human Communication Research,1994(21):3-35.
  • 5Chen Rong.Self-Politeness:A Proposal[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2001(33):87-106.
  • 6Leech.Geoffrey N.Principle of Pragmatics[M].New York:Long-man.1983.
  • 7Brown,P and Levinson,S.Politeness:Some Universals in Language Use[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1987.
  • 8Locher,Miriam.Power and Politeness in Action.Disagreement in O-ral Communication[M].New York:Mouton de Gmyter.2004.
  • 9Lakoff,G.Hedges.a Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts[J].Journal of Philosophical Losic,1972(2).
  • 10Prince,Eilen F,Joel Frader and Charles Book.On Hedgingin Phy-slcian-Physician Discourse[C]//In Lingmstics and Professions.Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium On Language Studles,ed.R.di Pi-etro.Norwood.NJ:Abhx Publishing Corporation.1982.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部