期刊文献+

大脑中动脉粥样硬化狭窄的3.0T HR-MRI和DSA比较研究 被引量:8

Comparison of 3.0T high-resolution MRI and DSA of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析3.0T HR-MRI和DSA对疾病患者的大脑中动脉M1段(即水平段)狭窄程度的诊断符合情况,探讨3.0T HR-MRI评价大脑中动脉狭窄程度的临床价值。方法:67例大脑中动脉狭窄患者均行3.0T HR-MRI和DSA检查,并以DSA为金标准计算HR-MRI诊断大脑中动脉狭窄程度的敏感性、特异性、准确性以及阳性预测值、阴性预测值,分析3.0T HR-MRI诊断大脑中动脉狭窄程度与DSA的符合情况。结果:67例病人共134段目标血管,HR-MRI与DSA诊断相符合共124段,符合率92.5%,HR-MRI诊断大脑中动脉轻、中、重度狭窄及闭塞的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为80%、99.2%、98.5%、80%、99.2%,95.7%、98.5%、91.4%、84.6%、98.5%,84%、98.2%、91.4%、80.8%、95.7%,100%、100%、100%、100%、100%。Youden指数分别为79.2%、94.2%、82.2%、100%,Kappa值分别为0.792、0.788、0.895、1。结论:3.0T HR-MRI在评价大脑中动脉狭窄程度方面具有很高的敏感性、特异性和准确性,与DSA诊断有很好的相关性,结合管壁成像,可作为大脑中动脉粥样硬化狭窄筛查的一种常规检查方法。 Objective: To compare 3.0T HR-MRI and DSA for the diagnosis of the middle cerebral artery M1 segment stenosis and discuss the clinical value and limitation of 3.0T HR-MRI in the diagnosis of middle cerebral artery atherosclerot- ic stenosis. Methods: Sixty-seven patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease received both 3.0T HR-MRI and DSA exam- inatin. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of 3.0T HR-MRI diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis were calculated using DSA as the golden standard. The clinical value of 3.0T HR-MRI di- agnosis of intracranial vascular stenosis was evaluated. Results: Among 67 patients, 124 blood vessels showed the same condi- tion as DSA, with the coincidence rate of 92.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative pre- dictive value in 3.0T HR-MRI diagnosis of mild degree, moderate degree, severe degree stenosis and obliteration were 80%, 99.2%, 98.5%, 80%, 99.2%; 95.7%, 98.5%, 91.4%, 84.6%, 98.5%; 84%, 98.2%, 91.4%, 80.8%, 95.7%; 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%. For mild, moderate, severe degree stenosis, and occlusion of MCA rates according to Youden index were 79.2%, 94.2%, 82.2%, 100%; Kappa values were 0.792, 0.788, 0.895, 1. Conclusions: 3.0T HR-MRI evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis has a high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, with a good relevance with DSA. 3.0T HR-MRI can replace DSA to become a general choice for cerebrovascular stenosis screening examination.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2014年第8期551-554,共4页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基金 全军医学科技"十二五"重点项目(BWS12J026)
关键词 动脉硬化 大脑中动脉 磁共振成像 血管造影术 数字减影 Arteriosclerosis Middle cerebral artery Magnetic resonance imaging Angiography, digital subtraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王艳,王伊龙,吴敌,王拥军.颅内动脉中重度狭窄的危险因素研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2007,2(6):486-490. 被引量:19
  • 2周斌,张慧,高芳.脑梗死与颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄及危险因素的关系[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(19):2244-2245. 被引量:14
  • 3Feldmann E, Daneanlt N, Kwan E, et al. Chinese-white differ- ences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease[J]. Neurology, 1990, 40(10): 1541-1545.
  • 4Saeco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, et al. Race-ethnicity and deter- minants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study[J]. Stroke, 1995, 26(1): 14-20.
  • 5Wong KS, Huang YN, Gao S, et al. Intracranial stenosis in Chi- nese patients with acute stroke[J]. Neurology, 1998, 50(3): 812-813.
  • 6Wong KS, Li H, Lain WW, et al. Progression of middle cerebral artery occlusive disease and its relationship with further vascular events after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2002, 33(2): 532-536.
  • 7Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, et al. A standardized method for measuring intraeranial arterial stenosis [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2000, 21(4): 643-646.
  • 8Kasner SE, Lynn MJ, Chimowitz MI, et al. Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASID[J]. Neurology, 2006, 67(7): 1275-1278.
  • 9Kominami M, Yamada N, Imakita S, et al. MR angiography of artero-occlusive lesions of intracranial arteries: a comparative study between turbo MRA and conventional MRA[J]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 1999, 59(11): 504-509.
  • 10Wetzel SG, Cha S, Law M, et al. Preoperative assessment of in- tracranial tumors with perfusion MR and a volumetric interpolat- ed examination: a comparative study with DSA[J]. Am J Neuro- radiol, 2002, 23(10): 1767-1774.

二级参考文献24

共引文献31

同被引文献57

引证文献8

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部