社会复杂性信念、地位知觉和区域刻板印象的关系:基于粤港刻板印象的研究被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要考察了广东人的社会复杂性信念、香港的区域刻板印象和香港地位知觉认识之间的关系。结果表明社会复杂性与香港区域刻板印象的形成有关,且影响香港地位知觉,即社会复杂性的认识不同,其对香港形成的刻板印象也不同。另外,对香港地位的知觉在广东人的社会复杂性信念和相关区域刻板印象之间起着显著的中介作用。结论:广东人的社会复杂性认识是影响对香港的区域刻板印象的一个重要因素,且能通过香港地位知觉的认识进一步影响香港的区域刻板印象的形成。

作者李航宇陆爱桃郑爽蔡思敏胡慧清

机构地区华南师范大学心理应用研究中心暨心理学院/心理健康与认知科学广东重点实验室/广东省突发事件心理援助应急技术研究中心

出处《人力资源管理》 2014年第10期65-67,共3页 Human Resource Management

基金华南师范大学统一战线理论研究基金(HT1308)资助国家基础科学人才培养基金(J1030729和J1210024)资助

关键词社会复杂性香港地位知觉区域刻板印象中介效应

分类号 C912.6 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Abrams, D. E., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Social identity and social cognition: Blackwell Publishing.
2Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups.Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(1), 25.
3Elron, E. (1998). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(4), 393-412.
4Fiske, S. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind,and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(3), 299- 322.
5Guan, Y., Deng, H., & Bond, M. H. (2010). Examining stereotype content model in a Chinese context: inter-group structural relations and Mainland Chinese's stereotypes towards Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(4), 393-399.
6Hong, Y.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., Yeung, G., & Tong, Y.-y. (1999). Social comparison during political transition: Interaction of entity versus incremental beliefs and social identities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(2), 257-279.
7Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de C Hernandez, M., Murakami, F., Axioms: The Search for Univ Beliefs about How the World Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286- arrasquel, S. R., Munoz, C Singelis, T. M. (2002). Socia ersal Dimensions of Genera Functions. Journal of Cross 302.
8Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20(4), 294-320.
9Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25(1), 1-65.
10Simon, B., & social context group status. 66(4), 699. Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and The effects of relative in-group size and in Journal of personality and social psychology.