期刊文献+

基于投影寻踪模型的装备保障性目标评估 被引量:2

Supportability,Target Value Evaluation of Materiel Based on Projection Pursuit Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 应用投影寻踪法,对保障性目标评估标准进行分析,利用在每个级别范围内随机产生的样本,建立了投影寻踪模型,确定了保障性目标评估指标的权重系数,得到了投影特征值变化区域与分类级别的对应关系,对某型航空装备使用初期的保障性试验数据进行分析,得到了其使用初期的级别和评估等级.为实现装备保障性评估目标评估拓展了新的途径,提供了科学依据. Based on the analysis of supportability target evaluation standard and the sam- ples got randomly within the range of each class, projection pursuit model is set up with the projection pursuit method, which ascertains the weight coefficient of the supportability target evaluation index and yields the change range of projection characteristic value and the relationship between the classification grades. By analyzing the supportability experimental data of certain aerospace equipment during the initial stage of application, the initial stage application level and the evaluation grade are obtained. Thus, a new method is discovered and scientific basis is provided to assess the equipment supportability target value evaluation.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第16期160-165,共6页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 军队科研计划项目
关键词 投影寻踪模型 装备保障性目标 评估 projection pursuit model supportability target value evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献45

共引文献63

同被引文献23

  • 1代宝乾,汪彤,秦跃平.城市灾害应急目标管理及动态管理模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(z1):695-699. 被引量:2
  • 2司小胜,胡昌华,周志杰.基于证据推理的故障预报模型[J].中国科学:信息科学,2010,40(7):954-967. 被引量:13
  • 3Chen S M, Lee L W. Fuzzy interpolative reasoning for sparse fuzzy rule-based systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38:9947-9957.
  • 4Castillo O, Melin P. A review on interval type-2 fuzzy logic applications in intelligent control[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 279(20):615-631.
  • 5Primiero G, Taddeo M. A modal type theory for formalizing trusted[J]. Journal of Applied Logic, 2012, 10(1):92-114.
  • 6Menzies T, Kocaguneli E, Minku L, et al. The importance of goals in model-based reasoning[J]. Sharing Data and Models in Software Engineering, 2015, 23:305-320.
  • 7Giorgini P, Mylopoulos J, Sebastiani R. Goal-oriented requirements analysis and reasoning in the Tropos methodology[J]. Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 18(2):159-171.
  • 8Giorgini P, Mylopoulos J, Nicchiarelli E, et al. Formal reasoning techniques for goal models[J]. Journal on Data Semantics, 2003, 1(1):1-20.
  • 9Aiello M, Giorgini P. Applying the Tropos methodology for analyzing web services requirements and reasoning about qualities of services[J]. CEPIS Upgrade the European Journal of the Informatics Professional, 2004, 5(4):20-26.
  • 10Josang A, Deniel M, Vannoorenberghe P. Strategies for combining conflicting dogmatic beliefs[C]//Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003:1133-1140.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部