期刊文献+

流式细胞术在小鼠局部淋巴结试验中的应用研究 被引量:1

Application of flow cytometry on murine local lymph node assay
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的将流式细胞术应用到小鼠局部淋巴结实验(local lymph node assay,LLNA)中,期望建立既可检测化学物致敏性也可同时检测刺激性的方法。方法受试物分为溶剂对照[AOO(丙酮∶橄榄油=4∶1)]、阴性对照(NaCl)、致敏阳性物[己基肉桂醛(HCA)、2,4-二硝基氯苯(DNCB)、2-氨基酚(2-APC)]、刺激阳性物[KOH、十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)]。采用8-10周龄16-22g的雌性Balb/c小鼠76只,随机分为19个受试物剂量组,每剂量组4只小鼠。每种受试物分别设低、中、高3个剂量组,检测浓度分别为NaCl(100g/L、200g/L、300g/L)、HCA(V/V:3.3%、10.0%、30.0%)、DNCB(2.5g/L、5.0g/L、10.0g/L)、2-APC(12.5g/L、25.0g/L、50.0g/L)、KOH(25g/L、50g/L、100g/L)、SLS(50g/L、100g/L、200g/L)。于试验第1、2、3天将配制后不同浓度受试物稀释液以每耳25μl/d均匀涂布于小鼠双侧耳后。检测小鼠耳缘厚度、耳引流淋巴结重量、B220+(CD45R)亚群淋巴细胞百分数等指标。采用SPSS 11.5分析软件,对数据型指标进行方差分析,并对有差异的个体再行LSD两两比较,并根据刺激指数对受试物致敏性大小进行分级。结果与溶剂对照比较中高剂量的SLS和KOH均可引起小鼠耳缘厚度增加(P〈0.01)。可判定SLS、KOH对皮肤有刺激性。DNCB、HCA各剂量组和2-APC高剂量组刺激指数均大于3,可以判断该3种化学物为皮肤致敏物。根据SI计算EC3的值,对致敏物进行分类:DNCB(0.196)为强致敏物,HCA(1.556)和2-APC(3.156)为中等致敏物。结论应用流式细胞术(flow cytometry,FCM)检测B220+(CD45R)亚群淋巴细胞百分数作为致敏性观察指标的改良小鼠淋巴结实验,结合耳缘厚度检测可实现同时评价化学物的皮肤致敏性和刺激性。 Objective To explore the potential application of flow cytometry in murine local lymph nodes assay(LLNA)for testing both chemical sensitization and irritation. Methods Test substances used in the study included solvent control(AOO),negative control(NaCl),sensitizers(HCA,DNCB and 2-APC)and irritants(KOH,SLS),and each testing material was prepared at low,medium and high doses(NaCl 100,200,300g/L,HCA 3.3%,10%,30%,DNCB 2.5,5.0,10.0g/L,2-APC 12.5,25.0,50.0g/L,KOH 25,50,100g/ml,SLS 50,100,200g/L).76 female Balb/c mice aged 8-10 weeks were evenly divided into 19 testing groups and was coated with 25μl per ear of different dosage of testing material around the back of both ears in the first 3days.The thickness of ear,ear drainage lymph nodes weight and lymphocyte percentage of B220+(CD45R)subgroup were measured and determined.Data were processed by ANOVA,and were further compared and analyzed by LSD if the difference was significant.The sensitization was graded according to the stimulating index. Results Significant increases in ear marginal thickness were found in mice at medium and high dosage groups of KOH and SLS compared to mice in solvent control(P〈0.01),which was considered as the result of irritation.Meanwhile,the stimulating index of high dose 2-APC and 3testing dosages of HCA and DNCB were all higher than 3,indicating that they were all chemical sensitizers.According to the value of EC3,DNCB(0.196)was classified as strong sensitizer and HCA(1.556)and 2-APC(3.156)as medium sensitizers. Conclusions When combined with mice ear marginal thickness,lymphocyte percentage of B220+(CD45R)determined by flow cytometry as observed marker for sensitization in reformed LLNA can be used to evaluate both sensitization and irritation at the same time.
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期477-481,共5页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
基金 浙江省科技计划项目(2011C37086)
关键词 局部淋巴结试验 小鼠 致敏性 刺激性 流式细胞术 LLNA Murine Sensitization Irritation FCM
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1OECD. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals; skin sensitization: local lymph node assay [EB/OL].[2013-11 01]. http: //iccvam. niehs, nih. gov/methods/im munotox/OECD429, pdf.
  • 2何国群,黄琼,黄俊明,郑穗生,黄健康.噻唑蓝比色法测定化学物皮肤致敏性的研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2006,16(8):1007-1008. 被引量:5
  • 3何国群,黄俊明,黄琼,郑穗生,李庆,谭小华,古梅英,谢晓平.BrdU掺入法评估化学物皮肤致敏性的实验研究[J].华南预防医学,2007,33(6):70-71. 被引量:4
  • 4黄海雄,庾蕾,何国群,杨湘霞,黄琼,杨淋清,刘丽清.应用BrdU-ELISA法检测化学物皮肤致敏性研究[J].职业与健康,2008,24(12):1133-1135. 被引量:5
  • 5Sailstad DM. Murine local lymph node assay: an alternative test method for skin hypersensitivity testing [J]. Lab Anim, 2002, 31 (10): 36-41.
  • 6Kimber I, Basket'fer DA, Butler M, etal. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals [J].Food Chem Toxicol, 2004, 41 (12): 1799 -1809.
  • 7刘珍,刘俊平,王飞,许桂凤,侯娟,万旭英,张天宝.化妆品安全性评价中小鼠局部淋巴结试验方法的改进[J].卫生研究,2009,38(5):585-589. 被引量:8
  • 8Evans PF. Regulatory experience with the mouse local lymph node assay for skin sensitization [J]. Toxicology, 2007, 231 (2): 91- 99.
  • 9Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, et al. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals [J]. Methods, 2007, 41 (1): 54-60.
  • 10Gerberick FG, Cruse LW, Ryan CA, et al. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irri- tants in the local lymph node assay [J]. Toxicol Sci, 2002, 68 (9): 420-428.

二级参考文献30

  • 1何国群,黄琼,黄俊明,郑穗生,黄健康.噻唑蓝比色法测定化学物皮肤致敏性的研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2006,16(8):1007-1008. 被引量:5
  • 2OECD. Guideline 429. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals; Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay[ S], 2002.
  • 3MCGARRY H F. The murine local lymph node assay: Regulatory and potency considerations under REACH[J]. Toxicology, 2007, 238: 71- 89.
  • 4SAILSTAD D M. Murine local lymph node assay: an alternative test method for skin hypersensitivity testing[ J]. Lab Anita, 2002, 31 : 36-41.
  • 5KIMBER I, BASKETFER D A, BUTLER M, et al. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals [ J]. Food Chem Toxicol, 2003, 41: 1799-1809.
  • 6Evans P F. Regulatory experience with the mouse local Iymph node assay for skin sensitization[J]. Toxicology, 2007, 231: 91-99.
  • 7GERBERICK G F, RYAN C A, DEARMAN R J, et al., Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals [J]. Methods, 2007, 41: 54-60.
  • 8TAKEYOSHI M, SAWAKI M, YAMASAKI K, et al. Assessment of statistic analysis in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay (non-RILLNA) with a-hexylcinnamic aldehyde as an example[J]. Toxicology, 2003, 191: 259-263.
  • 9EHLING G, HECHT M, HEUSENER A, et al. An european interlaboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay[J]. Toxicology, 2005, 212: 60-79.
  • 10GERBERICKFG, CRUSE L W, RYAN C A, et al. Use ofa B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay[ J]. Toxicol Sci, 2002, 68 : 420-428.

共引文献15

同被引文献19

  • 1Saarnilehto M, Chapman H, Savinko T, et al. Contact sensitizer 2,4- dinitrochlorobenzene is a highly potent human TRPA1 agonist [ J ]. Allergy ,2014,69 (10) : 1424 - 1427.
  • 2Park S J, Cha HS, Lee YH, et al. Effect of nodakenin on atopic der- matitis-like skin lesions [ J ]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2014,78 (9) :1568 - 1571.
  • 3Yoon YS, Sajo ME, Ignacio RM, et al. Positive effects of hydrogen water on 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice[J]. Biol Pharm Bull,2014,37(9):1480 -1485.
  • 4Popov A, Mirkov I, Miljkovic D, et al. Contact allergic response to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in rats: insight from sensitization phase [ J ]. Immunobiology,2011,216 ( 7 ) :763 - 770.
  • 5Kostoryz EL, Zhu Q, Zhao H, et al. Assessment of the relative skin sensitization potency of siloranes and bis-GMA using the local lymph node assay and QSAR predicted potency [ J ]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006,79 ( 3 ) :684 - 688.
  • 6Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, et al. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals [J]. Methods,2007,41 ( 1 ) :54 -60.
  • 7Chehrehasa F, Meedeniya AC, Dwyer P, et al. EdU, a new thymi- dine analogue for labelling proliferating cells in the nervous system [ J ]. J Neurosci Methods,2009,177 ( 1 ) : 122 - 130.
  • 8Dearman R J, Humphreys N, Skinner RA, et al. Allergen-induced cytokine phenotypes in mice : role of CD4 and CD8 T cell populations [ J]. Clin Exp Allergy,2005,35 (4) :498 -505.
  • 9Fukuyama T, Tajima Y, Ueda H, et al. Prior exposure to immuno- suppressive organophosphorus or orgauochlorine compounds aggravates the T (H)1- and T(H) 2-type allergy caused by topical sensitization to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene and trimellitic anhydride[ J]. J Immunotox- icol,2011,8(2) :170 - 182.
  • 10Zhang EY, Chen AY, Zhu BT. Mechanism of dinitrochlorobenzene- induced dermatitis in mice : role of specific antibodies in pathogenesis [ J ]. PLoS One ,2009,4 ( 11 ): e7703.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部