期刊文献+

军事医学人才评价系统的解析 被引量:2

System for evaluation of human resources for military medical sciences
原文传递
导出
摘要 该文尝试揭示军事医学人才评价系统的本质特征和运动规律,分析了军事医学环境、人才竞争环境、政策制度环境对评价系统的影响,探讨了评价主体、评价客体、评价活动组成的系统结构及相互关系,阐述了评价的价值评估与判断功能、选择功能、导向功能、调控功能、监督功能以及功能间的自洽机制,讨论了评价系统特征和系统演化规律。 To reveal the intrinsic characteristics and rules of change within the system for evaluation of human resources for military medical sciences .We intended to gain insights into the system for the evaluation of human resources for military medical sciences while analyzing the effect of the environment of military medicine , competitions for talents and regulations on the evaluation system .We also interpreted the system structure composed of the evaluation subject , evaluation object and evaluation activity as well as their interactions .We also made an attempt to study value evaluations , judgment functions and functions of selection , guidance , manipulation and supervision and the self-consistency mechanism between the above-mentioned functions .We also analyzed the features of this complicated system and rules of evolution .
机构地区 军事医学科学院
出处 《军事医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期582-585,590,共5页 Military Medical Sciences
关键词 军事医学 人才 科学评价 系统解析 military medicine talents evaluation system analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献44

  • 1王松俊,吴乐山,孙建中.军事医学战略决策若干理论问题探讨[J].军事医学科学院院刊,2004,28(4):369-372. 被引量:6
  • 2[英]卡尔·皮尔逊.科学的规范[M].李醒民译.北京:华夏出版社,2003:14-18.
  • 3H. Zuckerman. (1970). Stratification in American Science. Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 40.
  • 4Stephane Baldi. (1998). Normative Versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citation:A Network-Analysis Model. American Sociological Review. Vol. 63, Dec.
  • 5Lowell L. Hargens, Warren O. (1967). Hagstrom, Sponsored and Contest Mobility of American Scientists. Sociology of Education. Vol. 40.
  • 6Val Burris. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review. Vol. 69, Apr.
  • 7Alain Touraine. (1974). The Academic System in American Society. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. p133.
  • 8National Science Foundation. (2004). Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation's Merit Review Process( Fiscal Year 2003).
  • 9Stephen Cole, Leonard Rubin and Jonathan R. Cole. (1977). Peer Review and the Support of Science. Scientific American. Vol. 237, Oct.
  • 10[美]科塞.理念人:一项社会学的考察[M].郭方译.北京:中央编译出版社,2001.

共引文献141

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部