摘要
目的:比较分析中晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗TP与PVB两种化疗方案的近期疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院2012年1月至2014年1月收治的接受同步放化疗的187例新疆维吾尔族宫颈癌中晚期患者(Ⅱb-Ⅳa期),根据化疗方案不同分为两组:TP方案组104例、PVB方案组83例。治疗结束4周后进行疗效评价,比较两组的近期疗效和毒副反应。结果:近期疗效:两种治疗方案对于鳞癌的有效率分别为85.9%及73.5%,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),对于非鳞癌(腺癌及腺鳞癌)的有效率分别为75.7%及40%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。毒副反应:骨髓抑制、周围神经毒性、胃肠道不良反应比较有统计学差异(P〈0.05)。肝肾功能损害、血细胞减少及放射性损伤无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:对于宫颈鳞癌,两种同步放化疗近期疗效相当,对于非鳞癌,TP方案优于PVB方案。TP方案的骨髓抑制及神经毒性反应发生率明显高于PVB方案、胃肠道反应发生率则低于PVB方案。
Objective To compare theshort-term efficacy and safety between TP and PVB schemechemoradiation for advanced cervical cancer. Methods Between January 2012 and January 2014, 187 Xinjianguygur patients with advanced cervical cancer (stage I1 b to 1Va) who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy inXinjiang medical university affiliated tumor hospital were analyzed. All cases were divided into two groupsreceiving radiotherapy concomitant (n = 104), PVB group (n = 83). Theshort-term efficacy and toxicity wasevaluated four weeks aftertreatment. Results For squamous cell carcinomas, the response rates were 85.9% and73.5% in TP and PVB group respectively (P 〉 0.05). For Non-squamous cell carcinomas (adenocarcinoma andadenosquamous), the response rates were 75.7% and 40% in TP and PVB group respectively (P 〈 0.05). B onemarrow suppression, neurotoxicity, gastrointestinal reactionwere significant different between two groups (P 〈0.05). Liver and kidney functiondisorder, blood cellsreduction, and radiation damagewere not significantlydifferent (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions For cervical squamous cell carcinomas, theshort-term efficacy of twochemotherapy regimens is similar while forNon-squamous cell carcinomas, TP regimengroup is superior toBonemarrow suppression and neurotoxicity in TP regimengroup is significantly higher than PVB group (P 〈 0.05),while gastrointestinal adverse reaction lower than PVBgroup.
出处
《实用医学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2014年第18期2928-2930,共3页
The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(编号:2013211A061)
新疆医科大学科研创新基金资助项目(编号:XJC2013125)