期刊文献+

多方参与且评价指标集有差异的方案筛选方法 被引量:4

Method for Screening Alternatives Considering Different Evaluation Criteria Sets Provided by Multiple Participants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对多方给出评价指标集存在差异情形的方案筛选问题,提出了一种基于软集理论的方案筛选方法。在该方法中,首先依据各方给出关于备选方案符合评价指标要求的可接受水平,构建各方相应的评价指标子集,进而针对各备选方案符合评价指标要求的结果构建针对各方评价指标子集的软集;然后构建所有方案均符合全部指标要求的软集,进而通过各评价指标子集的软集与所有方案均符合全部指标要求的软集的积运算和算子运算,得到对应评价指标子集的每方可接受的备选方案集;进一步地,通过各方可接受的备选方案集间的并集运算及交集运算,可得到最终的方案筛选结果。最后,通过一个算例说明了本文给出方法的可行性和有效性。 A method is proposed to solve screening alternatives problems based on soft set theory , in which the criteria sets given by multiple participants are different .In the method , the evaluation criteria subsets of each participant are first constructed based on the acceptance of which each alternative satisfies the requirements of evaluation criteria given by each participant .Then, according to the results that each alternative satisfies the requirements of evaluation criteria , the soft sets for the evaluation criteria subsets of each participant are constructed .Furthermore , the soft set that all alternatives satisfy the requirements of all evaluation criteria of multiple participants are built , and based on the operations of product and operators between the soft sets of evaluation criteria subsets and the soft set all alternatives satisfy the requirements of all evaluation criteria of multiple participants, the alternatives sets of each evaluation criteria subsets accepted by each participant can be obtained . And, according to the union and intersection operation between the alternatives sets in which the each alternatives set is accepted by each participant , the ultimate alternatives set passing screening can be obtained .Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method .
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期80-86,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271051 71271049) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(11YJA630180 14YJC630063) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助项目(N110706001)
关键词 管理科学 方案筛选方法 软集理论 评价指标 积运算 算子 management science method for screening alternatives soft set theory evaluation criteria product operators
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Roy B. Multi-criteria methodology for decision aiding[ M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
  • 2Hobbs B F, Meier P. Energy decisions and the environment: a guide to the use of multicriteria methods[M]. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
  • 3Chen Y, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2008, 45 (2) : 278-290.
  • 4Bana e Costa C A, Corrga E. C, De Corte J M, Vansnick, J C. Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio- technical approach [ J ]. Omega, 2002, 30 (3) : 227-242.
  • 5Yah H Y. The construction project bid evaluation based on gray relational model[ J ]. Proee,:lia Engineering, 2011, 15: 4553-4557.
  • 6Chapman D S, Webster J. The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection processes for job candidates[ J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2003, 11 (2-3) : 113-120.
  • 7Raymark P H, Schmit M J, Guion R M. Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for employee selection [ J]. Personnel Psychology, 1997, 50 (3) : 723-736.
  • 8Ehrman C M, Hamburg M, Krieger A M. A method for selecting a subset of alternatives for future decision making[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96 ( 2 ) : 407- 416.
  • 9Luo X X, Wu C, Rosenberg D, et al. Supplier selection in agile supply chains: an information-processing model and an illustration [J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2009, 15 (4) : 249-262.
  • 10Ma L C. Screening alternatives graphically by an extended case- based distance approach[ J], Omega, 2012, 40(1): 96-103.

二级参考文献16

  • 1李占明.多目标决策的效用函数方法[J].系统工程,1989,7(5):52-54. 被引量:22
  • 2徐玖平,陈建中.群决策理论与方法及实现[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.324,332.
  • 3Tavana M,Kennedy D T, Joglekar P. A group decisionsupport framework for consensus ranking of technicalmanager candidatesfJ]. Omega, 1996, 24(5): 523-538.
  • 4Ahn B S. Extending Malakooti’s model for rankingmulticriteria alternatives with preference strength andpartial information[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man andCybernetics: Systems and Humans, 2003, 33(3): 281-287.
  • 5Shih H S, Shyur H J, Lee E S. An extension of TOPSISfor group decision making [J]. Mathematical and ComputerModelling, 2007,45(7/8): 801-813.
  • 6Wendell R E. Multiple objective mathematicalprogramming with respect to multiple decision makers [J].Operations Research, 1980, 28(5): 1100-1111.
  • 7Li D F. Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multiattributegroup decision making[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2007,7(3): 807-817.
  • 8gagman N, Enginoglu S. Soft set theory and uni-intdecision making[J]. European J of Operational Research,2010,207(2): 848-855.
  • 9gagman N, Enginoglu S. Soft matrix theory and itsdecision making[J]. Computers and Mathematics withApplications, 2010,59(10): 3308-3314.
  • 10Majumdar P, Samanta S K. Generalised fuzzy soft sets[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2010,59(4): 1425-1432.

共引文献57

同被引文献39

  • 1樊治平,肖四汉.有时序多指标决策的理想矩阵法[J].系统工程,1993,11(1):61-65. 被引量:61
  • 2李占明.多目标决策的效用函数方法[J].系统工程,1989,7(5):52-54. 被引量:22
  • 3戴建华,李军,薛恒新.基于模糊判断矩阵满意一致性的方案排序研究[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(6):18-24. 被引量:10
  • 4ZADEH L A.Fuzzy Sets[J].Information and Control,1965(8):338-353.
  • 5ARANASSOV K.Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20:87-96.
  • 6PAWLAK Z.Rough sets:theoretical aspects of reasoning about data[M].Boston MA:Kluwer Academic,1991:17-22.
  • 7MOLODTSOV D.Soft set theory—first results[J].Computers Mathematics Application,1999,37:19-31.
  • 8MAJI P K,BISWAS R,ROY R A.Fuzzy soft sets[J].The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics,2001(9)(3):177.
  • 9MAJI P K,ROY R A,BISWAS R.On intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets[J].Fuzzy Mathematics,2004,12(3):669-683.
  • 10SUN B Z,MA W M.Soft fuzzy rough sets and its application in decision making[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2004,41(1):67-80.

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部