我国刑法解释中的类型思维与形式立场——以虐童事件的入罪问题为例

Type Thinking and Form Position of the Interpretation of Criminal Law in China

对于虐童行为是否定罪、应定何罪的争论,反映了不同的刑法解释立场,在当前法制转型期和四要件的犯罪论体系下,用类型思维解释刑法更具合理性,且应坚持刑法解释形式解释的优先性,不轻易突破文义的本来含义。这既是严密法网,贯彻罪刑法定,也是保障人权的应有之义。

The debate whether the child abuse behavior is convicted and how to convict reflected the different interpretation of criminal law. In the current legal system transition period and the 4-element crimi-nal theory, it is more reasonable to explain criminal law with type thinking, and we should adhere to the pri-ority of form interpretation without breaking through its original meaning. This is a good way to strict justice, carry out the principle of legality, and also guarantee the human rights.