期刊文献+

剖宫产率与剖宫产指征变化探析 被引量:3

Analysis of the Changes of Cesarean Delivery Rate and Cesarean Delivery Against
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察医院剖宫产率及其指征变化,分析近年来剖宫产率上升的原因。方法:选取笔者所在医院收治的产妇1000例,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,观察各项指征随时间而发生的变化。结果:剖宫产指征有所放宽,2010年1月-2013年12月笔者所在医院难产及剖宫产率呈逐年上升趋势,2013年与2011年剖宫产率比较,差异有统计意义(P<0.05);社会因素是剖宫产率上升的主要原因,2013年社会因素跃居第一位。结论:为保证母婴健康,应掌握剖宫产指征,多渠道宣传自然分娩,提高自然分娩率。 Objective:To observe the hospital cesarean section rate and changes in evidence in the analysis of our hospital in recent years the incidence rate of reason.Method:Selecting 1000 cases of maternal in our hospital,the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed,observing all the evidence changes over time.Result:Cesarean section proves eased,from January 2010 to December 2013,there was an upward trend in our hospital during childbirth and cesarean section rate,comparing 2013 with 2011,cesarean section rate difference has statistics significance(P〈0.05).Social factors were the main reasons for the cesarean section rate,social factors become the first in 2013.Conclusion:In order to ensure the maternal and child health,should grasp cesarean delivery charges,multi-channel propaganda natural childbirth,improve natural births.
作者 陈专
出处 《中外医学研究》 2014年第25期119-121,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 剖宫产率 剖宫产指征 变化 Cesarean delivery rate Cesarean delivery against Change
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献42

共引文献35

同被引文献12

  • 1Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115 (4):705-710. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318 ld55925.
  • 2Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(6):1281-1287. DOI: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013 e3181 fdef6e.
  • 3Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study[J}. BMJ, 2007, 335 (7628):1025.
  • 4Shah A, Fawole B, M' imunya JM, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa[J}. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (3):191-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013.
  • 5Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America[J}. Lancet, 2006, 367(9525):1819-1829.
  • 6American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J}. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(3):179-193. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2014.01.026.
  • 7Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver j, et al. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years[J}. Am J Obstet GyneCol, 2012, 206(5): 419.el-9. DOI: lO.lO16/j.ajog.2012.03.003.
  • 8王完英.剖宫产率与适应证1518例临床分析[J].中国实用医刊,2014,41(2):79-80. 被引量:7
  • 9新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(7):486-486. 被引量:389
  • 10漆洪波,杨慧霞,段涛.关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(7):487-489. 被引量:82

引证文献3

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部