期刊文献+

基于灰色多层次分析两种壳斗科树种人工林生态效益评价 被引量:4

Evaluating Ecological Benefits of Two kinds of Fagaceae Species Plantation Based on Grey Hierarchy Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以广西良凤江国家森林公园壳斗科(Fagaceae)人工林为研究材料,选择10个生态指标,通过灰色多层次模型及主成分分析,建立壳斗科两种树种人工林生态效益评价体系。在选择的青钩栲人工林和麻栎人工林生态综合评价得分中,得出青钩栲人工林的两个准则层指标:森林地力权重(0.567 8)和土壤权重(0.457 8)均高于麻栎人工林;青钩栲人工林生态效益价值得分(5.512 5)比麻栎人工林(1.322 3)高。表明该生态系统评价体系能衡量人工林树种直接生态价值,对森林生态系统评价具有指导意义,可为今后生态系统研究提供理论依据。 Using Fagaceae species plantation of Guangxi Liangfengjiang national forest park as materials,ten ecological indexes were selected to establish ecological effect appraisal systems of the two timber plantation of Fagaceae with principal component analysis and grey hierarchy evaluation model.In comprehensive evaluation system of the two kinds of plantation,the scores of the two criteria layer indexes of Castanopsis kawakamii Hayata were the weight coefficient of woodland weights of 0.567 8 and the weight coefficient of forest soil weight of 0.357 8,higher than that of Quercus acutissima Carruth.It is indicated that the ecological value of the ecological system of C.kawakamii Hayata plantation (5.512 5) was higher than that of Q.acutissima Carruth(1.322 3).The ecological effect appraisal system could measure ecological value and provide a theoretical basis for the future research of ecosystem.
出处 《湖北农业科学》 北大核心 2014年第13期3094-3098,共5页 Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基金 广西"十一五"研究项目(桂林科字[2009]22号) 国家自然科学基金项目(3126012)
关键词 壳斗科(Fagaceae) 人工林 生态效益 灰色多层次分析 生态系统评价体系 Fagaceae plantation ecological benefits grey hierarchy analysis ecosystem appraisal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1林鎔,林有润.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1991,76(2):1-250.
  • 2GOVAERTS R,FRODIN D G.World Checklist and Bibiography of Fagales (Betulaceae,Corylaceae,Fagaceae andTicodendraceae)[M].London:The Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew,1998.
  • 3刘茂松,洪必恭.中国壳斗科的分布格局类型分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1999,23(5):18-22. 被引量:23
  • 4周浙昆.壳斗科的地质历史及其系统学和植物地理学意义[J].植物分类学报,1999,37(4):369-385. 被引量:64
  • 5靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,饶良懿,牛建植,谢媛媛,张振明.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536. 被引量:277
  • 6GLENN W H.Valuing public goods with the contingent valuation method:A critique of Kanhnenman and Knetsch[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1992,23:248-257.
  • 7SMITH V K.Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources:An interpretive appraisa1[J].Land Economics,1993,69 (1):1-26.
  • 8PIMENTEL D.Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits[J].Science,1995,267:1117-1123.
  • 9日本林野厅.森林公益效能计量调查——绿色效益调查[M].杨惠民,译.北京:中国林业出版社,1982.
  • 10熊文愈.森林生态系统与环境保护[J].南京林产工业学院学报,1980(3):1-12.

二级参考文献248

共引文献2499

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部