司法言论“正当性”的比较法研究

A Comparative Study of “Legitimacy” in Judicial Speech

司法言论的"正当性"的内涵在于追求公平和正义,基于"班加罗尔"原则,公正、妥当和平等的伦理原则应视为衡量限制言论的标准,对于司法言论"正当性"的标准,同是英美法系的国家也有不同程度的差异,大陆法系国家在执行类似法制规范上有明显的差别。

The connotation of ＂legitimacy＂ in judicial speech lies in the pursuit of fairness and justice. Based on the Principle of Bangalore, ethical principles, such as justice, propriety and equality, etc. should be regarded as a measure for restricted speech. As for the standard of ＂legitimacy＂ in judicial speech, countries, though under the same Anglo-American law system, share differences in certain degree; civil law countries have obvious difference in implementing of similar legal norms.