摘要
建筑批评评如何能够实现推动建筑创作、实现文化传播的目的,取决于作者(建筑师)-文本(建筑作品)-读者(批评者)之间能否达成有效的共识。首先,批评话语中的概念必须是一致的,批评者之间偷换概念往往是意见分歧的主要原因,使建筑批评陷于无谓的争执之中;另外,优秀的建筑作品一定是个开放的文本,能够给予批评者以充分的解读空间;因此,任何解释或批评都是对于作者的"误读",都是合法的,作为作者的建筑师必须正视并包容。只有在这种有效共识的基础之上,建筑批评才是可行的。
Architectural Criticism depends on an effective consensus between the author (architect), the text (architecture) and the reader (critic) to make the goal of architectural creation and cultural transmission come true, The concept, as derived from critical discourse, has to be consistent, Differences of opinion arise from the obfuscation and replacement of concepts and turn architectural criticism into contentious territory. Outstanding architecture must to be open texts and give critics plenty of space for interpretation - every explanation or criticism is legal, Architects need to admit this and face up to it, The only way that Architectural criticism can work is if it is bases on such a basic agreement,
出处
《世界建筑》
2014年第8期46-47,118,共2页
World Architecture
关键词
建筑批评
偷换概念
开放文本
误读
architecture criticism, disguised replacement ofconcept, open text, misreading