期刊文献+

平行检测血清CA19-9和血浆K-ras突变对胰腺癌诊断价值的Meta分析 被引量:1

Diagnostic Value of Individual Versus Parallel Test of Serum CA19-9 and Circulating K-ras Mutation in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估平行检测血清CA19-9和血浆K-ras突变对胰腺癌诊断的价值。方法网络文献检索Pubmed、CNKI、维普等数据库,全面收集关于平行检测血清CA19-9和K-RAS基因突变对胰腺癌诊断研究的文献。采用Meta-Disk1.4、RevMan5和ComprehensiveMeta-AnalysisVersion2(CMA2)进行全面的Meta分析。结果按照预定的纳入标准,共纳入符合文献8篇。结果显示在胰腺癌的诊断中,平行检测血CA19-9和K-RAS基因突变的灵敏度和特异度分别是0.909(0.864-0.943)和0.711(0.618-0.792)。而单独检测血CA19-9和KRAS的灵敏度分别是0.719(0.656-0.776)和0.671(0.606-0.731);其特异度分别是0.693(0.6-0.776)和0.912(0.845-0.957)。单独检测CA19-9和平行检测的敏感度和特异度优势比(OddsRatio,OR)分别是0.793(0.6-1.038)和0.986(0.653-1.488)。单独检测K-RAS和平行检测的敏感度和特异度优势比(OddsRatio,OR)分别是0.773(0.585-1.022)和1.305(0.880-1.936)。 Objective To compare the sensitivity and specificity between individual and parallel detection of circulating K-ras mutations and serum CA19-9 level in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in Pubmed, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure ( CNKI ), Wanfang, Weipu and Google Scholar through May 2014. This study focused on and analyzed individual and parallel detection of serum CA19-9 and circulating K-ras mutations, with Meta-Disk 1.4, RevMan 5 and Comprehensive Meta- Analysis Version 2 ( CMA2 ) . Result Finally, eight studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Heterogeneity was not found ( P 〉 0.05 ) . Sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, diagnostic odds ratio for individual and parallel detection of serum CA19-9 and circulating K-ras mutations were summed up as follows: The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CA19-9 were 71.9% ( 95% CI: 65.6% to77.6% ) and 69.3% ( 95% CI: 60% to 77.6% ) ; for K-ras were 67.1% ( 95% CI: 60.6% to 73.1% ) and 91.2% ( 95% CI: 84.5% to 95.7% ) ; for parallel detection, the findings were 90.9% ( 95% CI: 86.4% to 94.3% ) and 71.1% ( 95% CI: 61.8% to 79.2% ) . The odds ratio of sensitivity and specificity that compares CA19-9 to parallel is 0.793 ( 95% CI: 0.6 to 1.038 ) and 0.986 ( 95% CI: 0.653 to 1.488 ) . The odds ratio of sensitivity and specificity that compares K-ras to parallel is 0.773 ( 95% CI: 0.585 to 1.022 ) and 1.305 ( 95% CI: 0.880 to 1.936 ) .
作者 靳大川 李军
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2014年第6期108-113,共6页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 CA19-9 K-RAS 诊断 META分析 PPancreatic adenocarcinoma, K-ras, Carbohydrate antigen 19-9, Diagnosis, Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献128

  • 1Liao, Quan,Zhao, Yu-Pei,Yang, Ying-Chi,Li, Li-Jun,Long, Xiao,Han, Shao-Mei.Combined detection of serum tumor markers for differential diagnosis of solid lesions located at the pancreatic head[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2007,6(6):641-645. 被引量:27
  • 2Chu T M,J Clin Lab Anal,1997年,11卷,225页
  • 3Urgell E, Puig P, Boadas J, et al. Prospective evaluation of the contribution of K-ras mutational analysis and CA 199 measurement to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer,2000, 36 (16): 2069-2075.
  • 4Boadas J, Mora J, Urgell E, et al. Clinical usefulness of K-ras gene mutation detection and cytology in pancreatic juice in the diagnosis and screening of pancreatic cancer [J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2001,13 (10): 1153-1159.
  • 5Mulcahy H, Farthing MJ. Diagnosis of pancreatico-biliary malignancy:dection of gene mutations in plasma and stool[J]. Ann Oncol, 1999, 10(suppl 4): 114-117.
  • 6Neoptolemos JP,Stocken DD,Friess H,et al.A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancerNew England Journal of Homeopathy,2004.
  • 7Steinberg WM;Gelf R;Anderson KK.Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas,1986.
  • 8Gogas H;Lofts FJ;Evans TRJ.Are serial measurements of CA-19-9 useful in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with imperable adenocalrcinoma of the pancreas,1998(02).
  • 9Jemal A;Siegel R;Ward E.Cancer statistics,2009,2009.
  • 10Wagner M,Redaelli C,Lietz M,et al.Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The British Journal of Surgery . 2004

共引文献63

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部