日本著作权间接侵害之考

Rethinking of the Infringement of Copy Right Indirect Infringement in Japan

著作权间接侵害的关键是是否可以认可停止请求,现行《日本著作权法》对此没有明确的界定,因此,著作权间接侵害的停止请求权的可否性及其范围成为日本争论的焦点和立法的课题。根据日本近年来出现的著作权间接侵权相关案例的纷争类型,虽然可以将侵权类型分为场所机会提供型、工具提供型、系统提供型三种,但依然存在继续考察和讨论的余地。我国学术界提出的著作权间接侵权表现类型与日本间接侵权的三大类型相比,稍显注重法条规定中出现词语的机械套用。此外,日本就构成间接侵权的认定、在法理上如何形成间接侵权的有效救济,特别是停止侵害救济的可行性等问题的提出,对我国在立法和学术研究方面给予了一定的借鉴参考。

The key element of the indirect infringement of copy right is whether it can obtain suspension. In the current Copy Right Law of Japan, there is no certain definition, therefore, the ability and the scope to suspend the indirect infringement of copy right has become the center to research in Japanese scholar circle. According to the recent relevant cases, though we can categorize the infringe types into following three groups： offered by the place; offered by the tools, offered by the system, there still exists the place for us to rethink and explore. Compared to those in Japan, The types presented by domestic scholars pay more attention on the application of the words in the provisions. Besides, the solution to the indirect infringement on the jurisprudence level and the definition of the indirect infringement presented by Japan, especially on the issue of the feasibility to stop the infringement will offer us some references on the legislation and legal research.