期刊文献+

技术溢出的同期效应与滞后效应比较 被引量:1

The Comparative Analysis between the Same Period Effect and the Lagged Period Effect of Technology Spillovers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以经典的AJ模型为分析框架,通过引入滞后效应模型对其进行扩展,分别在古诺竞争和伯川德竞争情形下,对企业之间技术溢出的同期效应和滞后效应进行对比分析。以跨国公司和中国本土企业为样本,建立行业面板数据模型,就跨国公司技术溢出对本土企业的影响进行实证分析,结果显示,跨国公司对中国本土企业存在同期正向溢出效应和滞后的正向溢出效应,而且同期效应要大于滞后效应,但滞后二期效应并不弱于滞后一期效应。 Based on the classic AJ models,we extend it by introducing the lagged period model of technology spillovers, and analyze the same period and the lagged period of technology spillovers in the Cournot and Bertrand competitive condi-tions respectively. As a theoretical basis,we take multinational corporations and local enterprises in china as an example, and establish the industrial panel data model to analyze the technology spillovers from the multinational corporations to the local enterprises. The result shows that there is the existence of the same period positive spillover effects and the lagged pe-riod spillover effects from the multinational corporations to the local enterprises,and the same effect is greater that the lagged effect,but two-period lagged effect is not weaker than one-period lagged effect.
作者 于娜
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第17期61-67,共7页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 大连市科技局项目"大连市战略性新兴产业环境与企业绩效研究"(2011D12ZC129) 大连市领军人才资助项目"大连市战略性新兴产业发展与结构优化研究"(2012278)
关键词 技术溢出 同期效应 滞后效应 跨国公司 technology spillovers the same period effect the lagged period effect the multinational corporations
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献215

共引文献1182

同被引文献22

  • 1徐冬林,郭云南.R&D投入对中国经济增长的动态时滞效应分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2007(6):36-43. 被引量:18
  • 2Anon Higon, D. The Impact of R&D Spillovers on UK Manufacturing TFP:A Dynamic Panel Approach [ J ]. Research Policy, 2007,36, (7) :964 - 979.
  • 3Axel Sonntag. Search Costs and Adaptive Consumers:Short Time Delay do not Affect Choice Quality [ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,2015,113, (5) : 64 - 79.
  • 4Blanchard, O. J. , and L. H. Summers. Hysteresis and European Unemployment Problem [ J ]. NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 1986, (1) :15 -78.
  • 5Cross, R. On the Foundations of Hysteresis in Economic Systems [ J ]. Economic and Philosophy, 1993, 9, ( 1 ) :53 - 74.
  • 6Cristiano Antonelli, Francesco Crespi, Giuseppe Scellato. Productivity Growth Persistence : Firm Strategies, Size and System Propertise [ J ]. Small Business Economic ,2015,45, ( 1 ) : 129 - 147.
  • 7David J S, Hwang Y, Pei B, Reneau J H. The Performance Effects of Congruence between Product Competitive Strategies and Purchasing Management Design [ J ]. Management Science, 2002,48, (7) : 866 - 885.
  • 8Hamvrick D. C. , Mac Millan I. C. Asset Parsimony Managing Assets to Manage Profits [ J]. Sloan Management Review, 1984, 25, (2) :67 -74.
  • 9John A. P. , Zhang L. & Don L. Competitive Strategy, Capabilities and Uncertainty in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in China and the United States [ J ]. Management Decision, 2015,53, ( 2 ) : 402 - 431.
  • 10Pelham A. M. Influence 5f Environment, Strategy, and Market Orientation on Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 1999,45, ( 1 ) :33 - 46.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部