期刊文献+

从决策理论看护士责任心教育策略 被引量:1

The sense of responsibility education strategy in nursing with decision theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以心理学的决策理论视角,结合框架效应理论、解释水平理论、单次-重复博弈效应理论,对常见护理不良事件产生的原因、处理的方式进行分析,探讨护士工作责任心教育策略。 From the perspective of decision making theory,analyzing both the reasons and the handling methods of common nursing adverse events combined with framing effect theory,construal level theory and single-repeated shot game theory, and discussing the educational strategy of nurses′working responsibility.
出处 《转化医学杂志》 2014年第5期309-310,314,共3页 Translational Medicine Journal
关键词 决策理论 护理不良事件 责任心 Decision making theory Nursing adverse event Responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1刘改云,王晓蓉.护理不良事件发生原因与防范对策[J].中国实用医药,2013,8(2):267-268. 被引量:1
  • 2D′AmourD,DubiosCA,TchouaketE,etal.Theoccurrenceofadverseeventspotentiallyattributabletonursingcareinmedicalunits:crosssectionalrecordreview[J].IntJNursStud,2014,51(6):882-891.
  • 3于会会,徐富明,黄宝珍,文桂婵,王岚.框架效应中的个体差异[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(6):894-901. 被引量:20
  • 4TverskyA,KahnemanD.Theframingofdecisionsandthepsychologyofchoice[J].Science,1981,211(4481):453-458.
  • 5AlmashatS,AyotteB,EdelsteinB,etal.Framingeffectdebiasinginmedicaldecisionmaking[J].PatientEducCouns,2008,71(1):102-107.
  • 6DavisonBJ,BreckonE.Factorsinfluencingtreatmentdeci-sionmakingandinformationpreferencesofprostatecancerpatientsonactivesurveillance[J].PatientEducCouns,2012,87(3):369-374.
  • 7彭嘉熙,张石磊,肖玮,苗丹民.自我-他人医疗决策差异研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(4):477-479. 被引量:6
  • 8彭嘉熙,吴迪,张振江,苗丹民.医学决策中框架描述对病人家属行为和态度的影响[J].山西医科大学学报,2013,44(1):13-15. 被引量:4
  • 9LiuY,ZhaoG,LiF,etal.Nursing-relatedpatientsafetyeventsinhospitals[J].JHuazhongUnivSciTechnologMedSci,2009,29(2):265-268.
  • 10vanGaalBG,SchoonhovenL,HulscherME,etal.Thede-signoftheSAFEorSORRY-study:aclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogram forthepreventionofadverseevents[J].BMCHealthServRes,2009,9:58.

二级参考文献123

  • 1阴赪宏,韩小茜,杨惠静,徐婉珍,苏京平,梁燕.医院科研分级管理制度初探[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2004,17(2):125-127. 被引量:9
  • 2梁竹苑,许燕,蒋奖.决策中个体差异研究现状述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):689-694. 被引量:26
  • 3刘雪峰,张志学,梁钧平.认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):611-618. 被引量:66
  • 4Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E.(1977). Analysis of self- efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287-310.
  • 5Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H.(1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context.In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended Thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford press.
  • 6Cheng, F. F., & Wu, C. S.(2010). Debiasing the framing effect: The effect of warning and involvement. Decision Support Systems, 49, 328-334.
  • 7Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N.(2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-655.
  • 8Epstein, S.(2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality.Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 159-184.
  • 9Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H.(1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
  • 10Fagley, N. S., Coleman, J. G., & Simon, A. F.(2010). Effects of framing, perspective taking, and perspective (affective focus) on choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(3), 264-269.

共引文献43

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部