金融危机后的国际政治经济学：学派、范式与议题被引量：2

International Political Economy in the Post-Crisis Era: Schools,Paradigms,and Issues

导出

摘要 2008年国际金融危机爆发后,国际社会涌现出一系列新问题。这不仅丰富了国际政治经济学的研究议程,而且将对其研究视角、范式和路径的演进等产生深远影响。美国学派和英国学派之间的论争引发了学界对国际政治经济学研究现状和未来发展走向的深刻反思。在这场论争中,理论的多样性重新得到珍视,"中国议题"也日益受到关注,更重要的是,一种可通约的、更具包容性的分析范式——分析折中主义日益兴盛。与此相对应,国际政治经济学研究议题不断拓展,金融危机的政治根源、全球治理的合法性、全球不平衡问题、全球金融治理与监管、新兴经济体崛起与全球秩序转型等问题备受关注,这使得问题导向型的研究拥有了更为广阔的空间,国际政治经济学也随之成为一门更加兼容并蓄的学科。 After the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008,a series of new problems have emerged in the international community,which not only enriches the International Political Economy( IPE) research agenda,but also has a significant impact on the IPE research perspectives,paradigms,and approaches. The debate between the American School and British School sparked a profound reflection on the current situation and future development of IPE. Over the course of the debate,the diversity of theories has been cherished again and China-related issues have attracted increasing attention. More importantly,analytical eclecticism,a commensurable and more inclusive analytical paradigm,has been flourishing gradually. Meanwhile,IPE has expanded the range of its research agenda to have included topics such as the political sources of the financial crisis,the legitimacy of global governance,global imbalances,global financial governance and regulation,emerging economies and transition of the global order,etc. As a result,problem-driven research has been gaining ground and IPE is becoming a more inclusive discipline.

作者徐秀军

机构地区中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所副研究员

出处《国际政治研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期90-107,8,共18页 The Journal of International Studies

关键词国际政治经济学金融危机理论流派研究范式研究议题

分类号 D0 [政治法律—政治学] F831.59 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献74

1Susan Strange, "International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Mutual Neglect," Interna- tional Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1970, pp. 304-315.
2Benjamin J. Cohen, "The Transatlantic Divide: Why are American and British IPE so Different?" Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2007, pp. 197-219.
3Benjamin J. Cohen, International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, Princeton: Princeton Univer- sity Press, 2008.
4[美]本杰明·科恩.《国际政治经济学:学科思想史》,杨毅,钟飞腾译,上海世纪出版集团2010年版.
5Hana Sabanovic and Sally Trethevie, "From Political Economy to International Political Economics," in Ralph Pettman, ed., Handbook on International Political Economy, Singapore : World Scientific, 2012, pp. 20-21.
6Benjamin J. Cohen, "Towards a New Consensus: From Denial to Acceptance," in Nicola Phillips and Catherine Weaver, eds., International Political Economy: Debating the Past, Present and Future, London and New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 231-239.
7Richard Higgott and Matthew Watson, "All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe : Professor Cohen's Transatlantic Voyage in IPE," Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-17.
8John Ravenhill, "In Search of the Missing Middle, " Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 18-29.
9Benjamin J. Cohen, "The Transatlantic Divide: A Rejoinder," Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 30-34.
10Catherine Weaver, "Reflections on the American School: An IPE of Our Making," Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-5.