期刊文献+

科学教科书中的意识形态及其话语建构--以初中物理和化学教科书为例 被引量:11

Ideology and Its Discursive Construction in Science Textbooks: A Case Study of Junior Physics and Chemistry Textbooks
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文依据Bernstein的教育话语理论和系统功能语言学理论,对现行初中物理和化学教科书进行语言分析,以揭示科学教科书的归类和构架原则背后所隐藏的意识形态及其所要建构的理想学习者。研究发现,教科书所展现的强式归类和构架体现了教科书的编码取向:呈现科学的"非人化"、强调科学结果而不是过程、强化研究结论的"确定性"和"不容挑战"的形象。这种编码取向不利于提高学习者的科学素质,有碍其自主和创新精神的培养。解决该问题的方法是改变科学话语,尤其是科学语言,以提高学习者的参与积极性。 Drawing on Bemstein's theory of pedagogic discourses and Systemic Functional Linguistics, this article conducts an analysis of the language of Chinese junior school textbooks of physics and chemistry so as to reveal the ideology hidden behind the classification and framing of science textbooks and the ideal readership they are trying to construct. It is found that the coding of science text- books is characterized by a strong classification and fram- ing orientation, as reflected in presenting science as "inhuman", emphasizing science products over processes and reinforcing an illusion of unequivocality and non - chal- lengeability of research conclusions. Such a coding orientation hinders the development of the learners' scientific literacy and innovativeness. To address this problem, the most viable solution is to change the language of scientific discourses with a view to promoting the learners' initiative and engagement.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期11-16,35,共7页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 科学教科书 归类 构架 意识形态 科学素质 science textbooks classification framing ideology scientific literacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Bernstein,B.1996.Pedagogy,Symbolic Control and Identity:Theory,Research,Critique [ M ].Oxford:Rowman and Little-field.
  • 2Bernstein,B.2003.Class,Codes,and Control:The Structu-ring of Pedagogic Discourse [ M ].London:Routledge.
  • 3Brown,P.& S.Lovinson.1987.Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage [ M ].Cambridge:CUP.
  • 4Chiappetta,E.,G.Sethna & D.Fillman.1993.Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? [ J]Journal of Research in Science Teach-ing,(7):787-797.
  • 5Christie,F.1996.The role of a functional grammar in devel-opment of a critical literacy [ A ].In G.Bull & M.Anstey(eds.).The Literacy Lexicon [ C ].Sydney:Prentice Hall.
  • 6Christie,F.2006.Introduction[ A].In F.Christie(ed.).Ped-agogy and the Shaping of Consciousness [ C ].New York:Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • 7Halliday,M.& J.Martin.1996.Writing Science:Literacy and Discursive Power[ M].London:The Falmer Press.
  • 8Hodge,R.& G.Kress.1993.Language as Ideology [ M].London:Roufledge.
  • 9Kuhn,T.1963.The function of dogma in scientific research [ A ].In A.Crombie(ed.).Scientific Change [ C ].London:Heinemann.
  • 10Lemke,J.1990.Talking Science:Language,Learning and Values [ M ].Norwood:Ablex.

二级参考文献81

共引文献139

同被引文献106

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部