期刊文献+

教师审美镜像的形成与重构

The Formation and Reconstruction of Teachers' Aesthetic Image
下载PDF
导出
摘要 审美功利所依据的快乐法则,使得我们长期以来一直被审美的愉悦性蒙蔽了,审美不仅是美善的,也是罪恶的。教师在长期的教学过程中,形成了审美镜像。此镜像依据审美功利愉悦法则以审美图式为参照,一方面将符合自身审镜像的次级图式纳入审美镜像之中,另一方面将不符合的次级图式拒斥于自身审美视阈之外。教师审美镜像的实施机制大致分为三个阶段:引发学生关注、促使学生动机位移、迫使学生异化认同,这三个阶段分别伴随的是教师实施的时空控制、规则控制、审美控制。此过程中,被拒斥在教师审美视阈外的学生便会因不被教师接受和理解而痛苦,使得教育极为不公平和非人性,冷漠而冰凉。 The law of happiness, which is the basis of the aesthetic utilitarianism makes us have long been accused of aesthetic pleasure is veiled, aesthetics is not only good, but also evil. In the long-term teaching process, teachers form the aesthetic image. This mirror according to laws of aesthetic utility pleasure to aesthetic schema as reference, on the one hand will fit with their secondary schema into the aesthetic image on the mirror. On the other hand, it does not conform to the secondary schema rejects from its own aesthetic realm. Teachers in the implementation of the aesthetic image mechanism can be roughly divided into three phases: cause students attention, help students motivation displacement and force alienated identity, the three stages respectively with the teachers' implementation of space and time control, control rules and aesthetic control. The process, has no outside the teachers' aesthetic perspective of students will not accepted by the teachers and the understanding and painful, makes education extremely unfair, inhuman l and cold.
作者 陈静
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期52-55,95,共5页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词 镜像理论 审美功利 教师审美镜像 审美镜像图式 师生关系 image theory aesthetic utilitarianism teachers' aesthetic images aesthetic image schema the relationship between teachers and students
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈歆,曹建斌.试论拉康的镜像理论[J].江苏工业学院学报(社会科学版),2008,9(3):4-6. 被引量:26
  • 2[法]拉康.拉康选集[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
  • 3[美]加洛蒂.认知心理学[M].吴国宏,译.西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2005.
  • 4[德]黑格尔.精神现象学(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.20.
  • 5[英]穆勒.功利主义[M].叶建新译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
  • 6[德]康德.判断力批判[M].邓晓芒,译.北京:人民出版社.2004.
  • 7[英]斯宾塞.斯宾塞教育论著选[M].胡毅译著.北京:人民教育出版社,1984.
  • 8马维娜.教育环境控制的双重面具[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2001,38(1):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 9[美]内尔-诺丁斯.学会关心--教育的另一种模式[M].侯晶晶,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2011.
  • 10王占魁.“公平”抑或“美善”道德教育哲学基础的再思考[J].教育研究,2011,32(3):56-61. 被引量:9

二级参考文献18

  • 1拉思斯.价值与教学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2003:8.
  • 2[1]柏拉图.文艺对话集[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1963.
  • 3[2](英)约翰·斯特罗克.结构主义以来[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1979:17.
  • 4哈耶克.法律、立法与自由(第一卷)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2001.
  • 5康德.道德形而七学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.10.
  • 6Habermas. Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls' s Political Liberalism[J]. Journal of Philosophy, 1995, (3).
  • 7葛力.十八世纪法困哲学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.1991.590.
  • 8弗罗姆.寻找自我[M1.北京:工人出版社,1988.269、271.
  • 9罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.61-62.
  • 10(法)米歇尔·福柯著,刘北成,杨远婴译.规训与惩罚[M].北京:三联书店,1999.

共引文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部