期刊文献+

制度视角的家族治理与企业绩效研究--来自中德上市家族企业的对比证据

Family Governance and Firm Performance based on the Institutional Perspective: Comparative Evidence from Chinese and Germany Listed Family Firms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 家族集中所有权、控制权和家族涉入管理对企业绩效到底有利还是有弊?相对于发达资本主义国家的企业,处于转型经济中的中国企业面临的外部不确定性更高,上述关系在不同经济体之间是否有区别?企业的治理效果取决于内外两种机制,内部的家族治理系统是对外部制度环境的不完善的补充。我们选取处于成熟市场经济的德国上市家族企业与处于转型经济中的中国上市家族企业进行实证对比,从制度的视角来探讨上述问题。研究结果显示两国上市家族企业的家族治理与企业绩效之间的关系是不一样的。结论表明治理结构并不一定对企业绩效产生直接影响,不同的制度环境会导致不同的作用机制产生。 Do the family concentrated ownership, family control and family involved management benefit firm performance? Compare to the corporations in the developed countries, the Chinese corporations in the transit economy face higher uncertainty from external environment. Do the above relationships have any differences between different economies? The corporate governance performance depends on the efficiency of a bundle of governance mechanisms including internal and external ones. The internal family governance system can substitute for the imperfect external institutional environment. We choose and empirically compare the listed family firms in German as mature economy and in China as transit economy, discussing those above questions from institutional perspective. The results show that the relationships between family governance and firm performance are different from two countries. The conclusions demonstrate that governance structure does not necessarily distinctly affect the firm performance, and different institutional environment results in different mechanism.
作者 李娜 王宣喻
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 2014年第10期82-99,共18页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 广东省哲学社会科学规划青年项目《家族所有、家族控制和家族管理对企业绩效的影响--基于中德上市公司的对比研究》(GD11YGL05) 广东高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划项目《基于制度观的家族企业治理与企业成长研究--以上市公司为例》(育苗工程wym11085)的阶段性成果 国家自然科学基金青年项目《农村社区环境、产业特性与涉农家族企业创业研究》(71202082) 广东省自然科学基金项目《农村社区环境、产业特性与涉农家族企业创业研究》(S2012040007465)的资助
关键词 制度 中德上市家族企业 家族治理 企业绩效 对比证据 Institution Chinese and Germany listed family firms Family governance Firmperformance Comparative evidence.
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1何轩,马骏.家族涉入、分配公平与员工漠视性沉默行为——一项不局限于家族企业的探索性实证研究[J].南方经济,2014,43(3):66-80. 被引量:8
  • 2Bai, C. E. , Liu, Q. , Lu, J. , Song, F. M. and Zhang, J. , 2002, "Corporate Governance and Firm Valuations in China. The University of Hong Kong," Working Paper.
  • 3McMillan, J. E. , 2008, "Freedom's Challenge", Trafford on Demand Pub.
  • 4Becker, G. S. , 1981, A Treatise on the Family. Published by Harvard University Press.
  • 5玛丽·奥沙利文.2007,《公司治理百年--美国和德国公司治理演变》,北京:人民邮电出版社.
  • 6李宜静,李新春.2009,《基于制度视角的中德家族企业治理结构的对比分析》,《比较管理》第1期,60-68页.
  • 7Bartholomeusz, S. and Tanewski,G. A. , 2006, "The Relationship between Family Firms and Corporate Governance," Journal of Small Business Management, 44 (2), pp. 245 - 267.
  • 8樊纲,王小鲁.2006.《中国市场化指数--各地区市场化相对进程报告》.经济科学出版社.
  • 9叶国灿.论家族企业控制权的转移与内部治理结构的演变[J].管理世界,2004,20(4):147-148. 被引量:36
  • 10Ehrhardt, O. , Nowak, E.O. and Weber, F. M. , 2006B, "Unifications of Dual-Class Shares in Germany Empirical Evidence on the Effects of Related Changes in Ownership Structure, Market Value, and Bid - Ask Spreads," working Paper, http ://ssm. comJabstract = 677000.

二级参考文献196

共引文献890

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部