期刊文献+

领导者博弈的实验经济学研究述评 被引量:3

REVIEW OF LEADERSHIP RESEARCH IN EXPERIMENT ECONOMICS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统经济学对领导者的重要作用并没有给予足够的重视,这一尴尬的局面直到近年来行为和实验经济学的兴起后才得以改变。总的来说,领导者博弈的实验经济学研究可分为组织间的领导者关系实验研究和组织内部的领导者博弈实验研究,其中组织内部的领导者博弈实验研究主要有非对称信息和公共品。当前的领导者博弈实验研究将会是正在兴起的行为产业组织、行为机制设计和行为政治经济学的重要组成部分。领导者博弈未来可能的研究方向则包括了现场实验、偏好基础和动态模型。 Traditional economics paid far from enough attention to the important role of leadership, such embarrassing situation had lasted until the emerging of behavioral and experiment economics in recent years. To sum up, the research of leadership in experiment economics includes inter-organizational leadership research and intra-organizational leadership research, whereby intra-organizational leadership research mainly composes of asymmetric information and public good. The present experimental research of leadership will be an important part of the emerging behavioral industrial organization, behavioral institutional design and behavioral political economy. The possible future of leadership study includes field experiment, the base of preference and dynamic model.
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期48-59,共12页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(14XNH040)
关键词 领导者 组织间 组织内部 实验经济学 leadership inter-organizational intra-organizational experiment economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1J. Potters, M. Sefton, L. Vesterlund. Leading-by-example and Signaling in Voluntary Contribution Games: An Ex- perimental Study [J]. Economic Theory, 2007, 33 (1).
  • 2W. Giith, M.V. Levati, M. Sutter. Leading by Example with and without Exclusion Power in Voluntary Contribu- tion Experiments [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2007, 91 (5).
  • 3M. G. Kocher, G. Pogrebna, M. Sutter. Other-regarding Preferences and Leadership Styles [Z]. IZA Discussion Papers, 2009.
  • 4S. Huck, W. Muller, H.T. Normann. Stackelberg Beats Cournot-on Collusion and Efficiency in Experimental Mar- kets [J]. Economic Journal, 2001, 111 (474).
  • 5M. Komai, M. Stegeman. Leadership Based on Asymmetric Information [J]. RAND Journal of Economies, 2010, 41 (1).
  • 6A. Hildenbrand. Is a Firm a Firm? A Stackelberg Experiment [J]. Economics: The Open-access, Open-assessment E-Journal, 2013, 7 (2013-20).
  • 7E. Van der Heijden, E. Moxnes. Leading by Example to Protect the Environment: Do the Costs of Leading Matter? [J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2013, 57 (2).
  • 8M. F. Rivas, M. Sutter. The Dos and Don'ts of Leadership in Sequential Public Goods Experiments [Z]. Working Papers in Economics and Statistics, 2008.
  • 9G. Pogrebna, D. Krantz, C. Schade. Leadership by Example and by Pre-game Communication in Social Dilemma Sit- uations [Z]. Working Papers, SSRN 1 247 262, 2009.
  • 10S. Huck, B. Wallace. Reciprocal Strategies and Aspiration Levels in a Cournot-stackelberg Experiment [J]. Eco- nomics Bulletin, 2002, 3 (3).

共引文献3

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部