期刊文献+

交互文化主义与多元文化主义之争——加拿大的案例分析 被引量:4

Interculturalism versus Multiculturalism:A Case Study of Canada
原文传递
导出
摘要 加拿大魁北克省长期以来一直在国内寻求承认其独特地位。特鲁多政府于1971年起在全国范围内推行多元文化主义政策,此项政策的出台等同于把作为加拿大"两个建国民族"之一的法裔魁北克人降低至与其他民族同等的地位,从而挫败了魁北克民族主义者为该省寻求独特地位的愿望。然而,随着寂静革命为魁北克社会带来的深刻变革,魁北克更加坚定地踏上了自己的民族构建之路。20世纪70年代起,交互文化主义模式的元素开始在魁北克酝酿,以此作为对联邦多元文化主义的回应。交互文化主义模式受到西方学界关注,许多学者甚至认为交互文化主义在增强族裔文化多元社会的整合和凝聚力上比多元文化主义更具优势;它在公共政策及现实政治中亦开始崭露头角。本文通过跨学科的视角考察魁北克交互文化主义的发展历程及最新的统计数据,不难发现交互文化主义与多元文化主义虽然在目前实践中存在相似之处,但二者在管理民族、文化多样性上仍然存在着本质差异。交互文化主义的整合模式在魁北克的实践中是卓有成效的。 The province of Quebec has long since been striving for its distinct status in Canada. However, the official launch of the muhicuhural policy by the Trudeau government in 1971 foiled the aspirations of Qu6b6eois nationalists through reducing Francophone Quebeckers as one of the "two founding peoples" to the same level as other peoples within the Canadian polity. However, with the profound societal changes the Quiet Revolution brought about, Quebec began get into strides on its nation-building, gradually taking the form of an "intercultural" model as a response to federal Canadian multicuhuralism. Though loosely defined thus far, the intercuhuralism model is contrasted positively with muhicuhuralism by many scholars in terms of achieving the integration and cohesion in an ethnocuhurally pluralistic society; and it is even favoured in the realms of public policy and realpolitik. An interdisciplinary examination of the trajectory of Quebec intercuhuralism and of the latest statistics indicates that federal Canadian muhieuhuralism and Quebec intercuhuralism, notwithstanding the resemblance they share in praxis for the present, are two essentially heterogeneous philosophies in managing ethnic and cultural diversity. The integration model of intereulturalism proves to be effective in Quebec's practice.
作者 刘兴澍
出处 《世界民族》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期1-17,共17页 Journal of World Peoples Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献76

  • 1Olivier Roy, "Islamic Terrorist Radicalisation in Europe", in Samir Amghar, Amel Boubekeur and Michael Emerson ( eds. ), European Islam: Challenges for Society and Public Policy, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2007, pp. 52 -60.
  • 2Gerard Bouchard and Charles Taylor, Fonder l' avenir. Le temps de la conciliation, Commission de consultation sur les pratlques d 'accommodement reliees aux differences culturelles, Quebec : Gouvernement du Quebec, 2008, p. 287.
  • 3Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Immigration, Integration and Employment, COM/2003/0336 final, europa, eu, European Union, http://eur - lex. europa.eu/legal - content/EN/TXT/PDF/? uri = CELEX:52003DC0336&from = EN.
  • 4Phil Wood and Charles Landry, The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage, London : Earthscan, 2008, p. 304.
  • 5"Cultural Diversity Adds to Cities'Dynamism", City Mayors, The City Mayors Foundation, 2012 - 10 - 31, http://www. citymayors. com/news/metronewsl, html.
  • 6Pierre Elliott Trudeau, " Multiculturalism", Canada History, http://www, canadahistory, com/sections/documents/Primeministers/ trudeau/docs - onmulticulturalism. htm.
  • 7Brian O' Neal, Parliamentary Research Branch of the Library of Parliament, Parliament of Canada, " Distinct Society: Origins, Interpretations, Implications", 1995 - 12, http ://www. parl. gc. ca/Content/LOP/researehpublications/bp408 - e. htm.
  • 8Alvin Finkel and Margaret Conrad, History of the Canadian Peoples: 1867 to the Present, Volume II, 3rd ed. , Toronto: Pearson Education Canada Inc, 2002, p. 337.
  • 9Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturallsm, Report of Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, Ottawa: Crown, 1967, p. xxxiii, xliv.
  • 10Rand Dyck, Canadian Politics : Critical Approach, 5th ed. , Toronto: Nelson, 2008, p. 129.

共引文献2

同被引文献96

  • 1李其荣.从同一到多元的历史轨迹——美国多元文化主义管窥[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,25(4):148-152. 被引量:13
  • 2[英]约翰·格雷,顾爱彬.自由主义的两张面孔[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002.
  • 3川崎市政府网站:http://www.city.kawasaki.jp/index.html.
  • 4日本总务省网站.《研究会关于推进多元文化共生的报告书》,http://www.soumu.go.jp/kokusai/pdf/sonota-b5.pdf.
  • 5外国人集住都市会议网站:http://www.shujutoshi.jp/.
  • 6在留外国人统计表:日本法务省网站:http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?lid=000001133760.
  • 7Thomas Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [ M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  • 8Francis Fukuyama. The End of History and the Last Man [ M]. New York: Free Press, 2006.
  • 9赛谬尔.P.亨廷顿.第三波:20世纪后期的民主化浪潮[M].欧阳景根译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012.
  • 10Zohan Barany & Robert G. Moser. Ethnic Politics after Communism [ M]. Ithaca and Landon: Cornell University Press, 2005.

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部