摘要
我国《侵权责任法》从形式上看固然已经从传统债法体系中独立出来了,但《侵权责任法》中规定的侵权责任承担方式与传统债法依然息息相关。学界中,既有学者认为我国《侵权责任法》中规定多元化的侵权责任承担方式是对传统侵权法理论的突破,也有学者认为其只是对传统侵权法理论的扩张性解释而已。有鉴于此,从债的基本属性——即相对性和给付性入手,对我国《侵权责任法》中规定的八种侵权责任承担方式做一探讨,以期揭示出侵权责任承担方式的本质都可能为债。
In form,the tort liability law in our country has been independent from the traditional debt law system,but the methods of bearing liability for torts are still closely related to traditional debt. Some scholars believe that the diversified methods of bearing liability for torts in our country are the breakthrough of traditional theory of tort law, some scholars think that they are just an expansionary interpretation of the traditional theory of tort law. In view of this, this paper tries another way, from relativity and payment for the basic attributes of debt to study on the eight methods of bearing liability for torts regulated in the tort liability law,the conclusion is that the nature of the methods of bearing liability for torts likely belongs to debt.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期158-164,共7页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
债的基本属性
相对性
给付性
侵权责任的承担方式
债的关系
the basic attributes of debt
relativity
payment
the methods of bearing liability for torts
debt relationship