期刊文献+

使用武力履行“保护责任”的规范约束问题 被引量:1

Norm Restriction on Use of Force in the Implementation of “Responsibility to Protect”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据"保护的责任"原则,为保护国内人民免遭严重的人权侵害,在紧迫情势下,国际社会应根据《联合国宪章》第七章进行武力干预。但是,目前所构想的有关武力干预的约束条件存在着很大的缺陷。为此,在武力干预方面,国际社会必须充分考虑和接受的是,现代国际秩序与框架结构的宏观约束。武力干预的具体约束条件需要得到进一步澄清和完善。第一,应将武力干预的目的严格限定在人权保护方面,不允许存在其他的动机、目的。第二,只有在尝试所有其他措施均不成功后,才能考虑武力干预,国际社会不应强调及早、灵活地运用武力措施。第三,联合国安理会应当成为武力干预的唯一的决策权威。 According to "Responsibility to Protect" principle, to protect internal people from severe violation of human rights, in the urgent circumstance, force intervention should be applied by international community according to the seventh chapter of United Nations charter. However,there exists severe deficiency in the restriction criteria being envisaged about force intervention. In the respect of force intervention, international community must sufficiently consider and accept structure restriction from current international order and framework, and concrete restriction criteria about force intervention should be further clarified. First, intention of force intervention should be strictly limited to sole object of human rights protection, and there is no access to any other motive or intention. Second, force measures should be set aside for use only after all other measures have been tried and found to be inadequate,and international community should not emphasize an early and flexible response. Third, United Nations Security Council should be the sole authority of decision- making on force intervention.
作者 赵洲 赵晨希
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期76-82,共7页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(10BFX098)
关键词 “保护的责任” 武力使用 不干涉 最后手段 安理会 "Responsibility to Protect" Use of Force Non-intervention Last Resort Security Council
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Mark C. Suchman. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3) : 571-610.
  • 2Antonio Cassese. International Law[M]. Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 2005 : 22-25.
  • 3[日]大沼保昭.王志安译.人权、国家与文明:从普遍主义的人权观到文明相容的人权观[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.
  • 4[英]尼古拉斯·惠勒.拯救陌生人:国际社会中的人道主义干涉[M].张德生,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2011:59-308.
  • 5陈一峰.不干涉原则作为习惯国际法之证明方法[J].法学家,2012(5):153-163. 被引量:11
  • 6Anne Orford. Jurisdietio without Territory: From The Holy Roman Empire to The Responsibility to Protect [J] Michigan Journal of International Law, 2009, 30 (3):981-1015.
  • 7Mehrdad Payandeh. With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept of the Responsibility To Protect Within the Process of International Lawmaking [J]. The Yale Journal of International Law,2010,35: 469-516.
  • 8Alan J. Kuperman. The moral hazard of humanitarian intervention:Lessons from the Balkans[J].International Studies Quarterly, 2008,52 (1) : 49-80.
  • 9Ramesh Thakur and Thomas G. Weiss. R2P:From Idea to Norm-and Action? [J]. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2009,1 (1) : 22-53.
  • 10[美]W.迈克尔·赖斯曼.政权更迭为何是(几乎总是)下策?[A].万鄂湘,王贵国.冯华建.国际法:领悟与构建-W.迈克尔·赖斯曼论文集[C].北京:法律出版社,2007:389.

二级参考文献70

  • 1丹尼尔·贝尔.《社群主义及其批评者》,李琨译,北京:三联书店,2002年,第1页.
  • 2赫德利·布尔.《无政府社会:世界政治秩序研究》.张小明译.北京:世界知识出版社,2003年.
  • 3约瑟夫·奈、门洪华编.《硬权力与软权力》,门洪华译,北京:北京大学出版社,2005年,第106页.
  • 4《康德著作全集》第6卷,李秋零,张荣译,北京:中国人民大学出版社2007年版.
  • 5R.J.文森特.《人权与国际关系》,第215-216页.
  • 6罗尔斯.《正义论》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第75页.
  • 7Reinhold Niebuhr, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics andPolitics, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2002, pp.83-112.
  • 8Charles R. Beitz, "Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics, " International Organization, vol. 33, no.3, 1979, pp. 405-424.
  • 9Steve Smith, "Paradigm Dominance in of International Relations as a Social Science, eds. , The Study of International Relations International Relations: The Development " in Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian, London: Macmillan Press, 1989, p.9.
  • 10约瑟夫·奈.《理解国际冲突:理论与历史》,张小明译,上海:上海人民出版社,2002年,第39页.

共引文献33

同被引文献18

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部