《海商法》英译“显化”手段的使用被引量：2

On Explicitation in Translation of Maritime Code of PRC

下载PDF

导出

摘要 "显化"是指原文本的隐含信息在翻译时得到明晰化。作为翻译普遍特征之一,目前针对显化的讨论主要集中在少数双语平行对比的文学译本比较,法律尤其是涉海法律英译领域较少论及。本文以《中华人民共和国海商法》英译为例,对海商法英译中的显化表现进行探讨,认为由于法律和文学文本的差异,目前基于文学翻译的显化分类并不能完全适用于海商法英译。海商法英译的显化体现在语言功能和法律功能两个层面。语言功能上的显化类似文学文本的显化类型;法律功能上的显化则表现在文本格式显化、文本特征显化和文本意图显化。 Explicitation refers to a course of embodying in the translation the information implicitated or hidden in the source text. Research on explicitation as one of the ＂translation universals＂, is mainly focused on comparative analysis of several language pairs in terms of literary translation. Little attention is paid to explicitation in the field of English translation of Chinese legal texts such as sea-related law. This paper discusses the cases of explicitation in the English version of Maritime Code of People＇s Republic of China. The authors point out that the literary translation based on classification of explicitation is not suitable for maritime law translation due to their differences in textual characteristics. Moreover, explicitation in maritime law translation is reflected at the levels of linguistic and legal function. The former is similar to that of literature translation; the latter includes expliciation in text format, text feature and text intention.

作者任东升刘冰艳

机构地区中国海洋大学外国语学院

出处《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 2014年第5期113-116,共4页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

关键词海商法英译显化 maritime law English translation explicitation

分类号 H059 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Baker, M. Corpus-based translation studies: the challenges that lie ahead [A]. In H. Somers (ed.) Terminology, LSP and Translation : Studies in language engineering in honor of Juan C. Sager [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub- lishing Company, 1996: 175-186.
2Perego, E. Evidence of Explicitation in Subtitling : Toward a Categorisation [J]. Across Languages and Cultures, 2003, 4 (1): 63-88.
3Williams, D. Recurrent Features of Translation Features in Canada : A Corpus-based Study [D]. Ottawa: School of Trans- lation and Interpretation. University of Ottawa, 2005.
4Gutt, E. A. Translation and Relevance: Congnition and Con- text [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2004.
5Vinay, J. P. & J. Darbelnel. Comparative Stylistics of French and English : A methodology for translation [M]. Amster- dam/Philadelphia:John Bejamins Publishing Company, 1995.
6Blum- Kulka, S. Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation [A]. In L. Venuti (ed.). The Translation Studies Reader [C]. New York/London: Routledge, 2004: 84-93.
7Seguinot, C. Pragmatics and explicitation hypothesis [J]. TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Redaction, 1988, 1(2): 106- 113.
8Pym, A. Explaining explieitation [ A]. In Krisztina Karoly (ed.) New Trends in Tranlation Studies. In Honour of Kinga Klaudy [C]. Budapest: Akad mia Kiad , 2005: 1-12.
9Klaudy, K. Explieitation. In Mona Baker (ed.) Routledge En- cyclopedia of Translation Studies[C]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2004 :80-84.
10Viktor, B. Abandoning the notion of "translation-inherent" explicitation: against a dogma of translation studies [J]. Across Languages and cultures, 2010,11(1):1-28.