期刊文献+

基于博弈分析的区域环境合作及收益分配研究 被引量:11

Study on Interests Allocation in Regional Environmental Cooperation Based on Game Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 污染的区域性特征要求地区之间开展环境合作,不同地区在区域环境合作中的收益存在差异,需要基于公平考量进行区域环境合作收益的地区分配设计。本文以双主体的博弈分析为基础,分析具有不同属性的两个地区在环境合作与非合作情形下的效用变动。研究发现,区域环境合作可以增加区域整体的收益;但是,对于具体区域而言,存在地区间环境合作共赢的临界值。当两个地区的属性差异小于临界值时,区域环境合作才可实现两地区收益的同时提升;而当两个地区的差异超过临界值时,其中一个地区的收益在区域环境合作中反而会降低。针对区域环境合作存在的地区主体收益受损的情形,讨论了在损失补偿基础上进行合作剩余分配的收益分配思路,并进行了不同补偿原则的数值分析;最后,建议加大对参与合作主体受损的补偿力度。 Regional environmental cooperation helps to increase regional revenue in the whole economy-environment system. However, areas in regional environmental cooperation will gain (or loss) differently, which may impede cooperation. Therefore, the reallocation of regional environmental cooperation profits is necessary to be discussed. According to a double area game analysis, the profit difference between regional environmental cooperation and non-cooperation is analyzed. The result shows that cooperation will increase regional overall profit, but there is a critical value for a win-win situation. When the property difference between two areas is less than the critical value, the profits of the two areas will both increase ; but when the difference is larger than the critical value, the profit will reduce in one area while increase more in the other area. Focusing on the latter situation, loss compensation and cooperation interests allocation are studied. The distribution are based on principles of economic scale, environment preference and pollution transmission, and a numerical analysis is conducted accordingly.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期11-16,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 环保公益性行业科研专项(编号:201309067)
关键词 环境合作 收益分配 博弈分析 补偿 environmental cooperation interests allocation game analysis compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior[ M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944:112 - 126.
  • 2Nash J F. Two Person Cooperative Games[ J]. Eeonometriea, 1953, 21(1) :129 -140.
  • 3Maler K G. The Acid Rain Game[ J]. Valuation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental Economics, 1989, 12 : 231 - 252.
  • 4Kaitala V, Pohjola M, Tahvonen O. Transboundary Air Pollution and Soil Acidification: A Dynamic Analysis of an Acid Rain Game Between Finland and the USSR [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, 2:161 - 181.
  • 5Kaitala V, Maler K G, Tulkens H. The Acid Rain Game as a Resource Allocation Process with an Application to the International Cooperation among Finland, Russia and Estonia [ J ]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1995, 97 : 325 - 343.
  • 6Bergin M S, West J J. Regional Atmospheric Pollution and Transboundary Air Quality Management [ J ], Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005, 30:1 -37.
  • 7Missfeldt F. Game-theoretic Modeling of Transboundary Pollution [J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1999, 13(3) : 287 -321.
  • 8Rose A, Stevens B, Edmonds J, et al. International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 12( 1 ) : 25 -51.
  • 9吕力.论环境公平的经济学内涵及其与环境效率的关系[J].生产力研究,2004(11):17-19. 被引量:8
  • 10徐玉高,何建坤.气候变化问题上的平等权利准则[J].世界环境,2000(2):17-21. 被引量:24

二级参考文献9

  • 1汤姆·泰坦伯格.环境与资源经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003..
  • 2刘思华.可持续发展经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1987..
  • 3尼古拉·阿克塞拉.经济政策原理,价值与技术[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001..
  • 4黄顺江.环境意识影响环境政策[N].中国环境报,1999—02—18(3).
  • 5Pearce, D.Wand Worford, JJ. World Without End: Economics, Environment,and Sustainable Development[M].New York: Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 6屈石杰.公民环境意识教育问题研究,绿石资料网(www.green—stone.org),2001-05-31
  • 7孙海东.全国公众环境意识调查显示中国人越来越关注环保,《北京晚报》,2001-05—25
  • 8Adam Rose,Brandt Stevens,Jae Edmonds,Marshall Wise. International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy[J] 1998,Environmental and Resource Economics(1):25~51
  • 9马缨.美国环境公平研究概述[J].国外社会科学,2003(2):19-23. 被引量:28

共引文献30

同被引文献131

引证文献11

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部