期刊文献+

“人民”的悖论:阿甘本问题与“群众路线” 被引量:24

The Paradox of the “People”:The Agamben Question and the “Mass Line”
原文传递
导出
摘要 "人民",是政治学的一个核心概念。然而,晚近政治哲学家阿甘本重新提出追问:"人民"到底是什么?阿甘本从思想史与词源学双重角度,指出了存在于"人民"理念中的吊诡。建立在这一分析上,阿甘本认为尽管人民主权是现代政治之正当性根基,然而今天它已经被抽干所有的意义。为了应对"阿甘本问题",本文进一步引入20世纪另一思想资源:"群众路线";并通过具体学理分析指出,"群众路线"的政治学有效地回应了内在于"人民"理念的悖论,在规范的层面上应治了当代政治世界的正当化危机与主权国家框架下的赤裸生命问题。 The concept of "people" is certainly one of the key political ideas. However, the Italian political philosopher Giorgio Agamben recently raised the question: what is a people? Through a detailed historical and etymological study, Agamben uncovers a critical ambivalence embedded with the concept of "people." Based on this study, he further argues that though serving as the legitimacy base for modern politics, popular sovereignty is however "now drained of all meaning." In order to tackle the issues raised by Agamben, in the paper I introduce another intellectual legacy of the Twentieth Century, namely, the theory of the "mass line." In this original study I endeavor to demonstrate that the "mass line politics" is effectively responsive to the paradox of the "people," and thus has the normative strength to resolve today's "legitimation crisis" and the issue of "bare life".
作者 吴冠军
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期92-100,共9页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"当代激进左翼政治哲学研究"(13CZX059) 上海市曙光学者项目"阿甘本政治思想研究"(13SG28)的阶段性成果
关键词 人民 阿甘本 群众路线 共同的表面 赤裸生命 people, Agamben, mass line, popular surface, bare life
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Emesto Laelau, On Populist Reason, London: Verso, 2005, p.122.
  • 2Giorgio Agamben, Means without End." Notes on Politics, trans. Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino, Minneapolis: University oi Minnesota Press,2000, p.32, p.29, p.31, pp.31-33..
  • 3吴冠军.“群众路线”的政治学[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2014,25(3):98-104. 被引量:17
  • 4Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998, p.106.
  • 5Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998, p.6.
  • 6Agamben, Potentialities, ed. and trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999, p. 162.
  • 7Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, p.109.
  • 8Agamben, Means without End: Notes on Politics, p.33, pp.34-35, p.35.
  • 9吴冠军.阿甘本论神圣与亵渎[J].国外理论动态,2014(3):44-53. 被引量:19
  • 10吴冠军.关于“使用”的哲学反思——阿甘本哲学中一个被忽视的重要面向[J].马克思主义与现实,2013,65(6):18-26. 被引量:6

二级参考文献45

  • 1福柯.《性经验史》,余碧平译,上海人民出版社2000年版,第79-85页.
  • 2Agamben, Profanations ,Zone Books ,2007 ,p. 73.
  • 3Agamben, Profanations, p. 73.
  • 4Agamben, Language and Death: The Place of Negativity, trans. Karen Pinkus and Michael Hardt, University of Minnesota Press, 1991, p. 105.
  • 5Agamben,Homer Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press, 1998, p. 106.
  • 6Agamben, ProfaTtations,p. 83.
  • 7Agamben, Profanations ,p. 81.
  • 8Leland de la Durantaye, "Homo profanus : Giorgio Agamben' s Profane Philosophy", Boundary 2, Fall 2008.
  • 9Agamben, Profanations, p. 73.
  • 10Jessica Whyte, "Use", in Alex Murray and Jessica Whyte eds. , The Agamben Dictionary, Edinburgh University Press, 2011, p. 195.

共引文献61

引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部