论西方价值理论的双重视域

On the Double Horizons of Western Axiology

西方哲学的起源和发展有其自身的内在逻辑,这一方面体现为西方哲学对本体的设定和持守,另一方面又展现为对哲学样式及其转型的理论显示。事实上,从更细微的环节分析会看到,在希腊哲学的早期就孕育着哲学板块的某种精神的"裂痕"。在这一"裂痕"的精神版图上可以比较精细地展现着西方哲学固有的、内在的"缝隙"。在此前提下西方哲学自身板块中所包含的深层的"异质性"之存在就有了自身的依据。从历史演进的逻辑观察可以看到,由形而上学自身所引发的对真理本身的沉思与对实践智慧的理解之差异,在西方哲学持续的进程中,有着"海德格尔的路标"式的意义,或许在这一分析的路向之中,才能理解西方价值哲学的双重意义,继而在当下的时代背景中领略马克思价值哲学的形而上之追求价值。

The origin and development of western philosophy follows its own internal logic, which is embodied both in the setting and maintaining of ontology and in the display of philosophy genre and transition. In fact, an analysis of details will help us to discover that Greek philosophy is pregnant with some ＂cracks＂ of philosophical plate in its early stage, which, as a spiritual domain, reveals the immanent ＂crevice＂ of western philosophy. Hereby, there has been a deep-seated ＂heterogeneity＂ in western philosophy plate and there appear different ways to contemplate truth and to understand practical wisdom. Thus, the dividing line between value and axiology comes into being. Only in this way, can we comprehend the double meanings of value and appreciate the metaphysical pursuit of Marx＇ s Axiological philosophy.