认知语言学研究的逻辑缺陷

The Logic Deficiencies of Cognitive Linguistics Research

认知语言学研究在逻辑上存在着一定缺陷。宏观上看,从作为论据的语言现实中推导出论点,又用论点来解释作为论据的语言,属于循环论证的关系。微观上来说,把不完全归纳论证得到的结论假设为真,作为演绎论证的前提,其论证可能是无效的。另外,认知语言学的几个主要的具体观点也存在逻辑问题。

There are a few logical deficiencies in cognitive linguistics research. Macroscopically, the arguments come from evidences, then are used as truth to explain the evidences, which is typical circular argument. Microscopically, using the conclusions based on imperfect induction as the premise for deductive argument may cause invalid argument. Moreover, there are some flaws involved in the main theories of cognitive linguistics.