期刊文献+

不同侧卧位对每搏量变异评估容量反应准确性的影响 被引量:8

The effect of lateral decubitus position on the abilities of stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察侧卧位对每搏量变异(SVV)的影响,评估侧卧位对于SVV判断容量反应准确性的影响。方法选择择期行侧卧位手术的患者52例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,分为左侧卧位(L组)和右侧卧位组(R组),每组26例。常规全麻诱导后,予侧卧位后手术开始前进行容量负荷试验,以0.4ml·kg-1·min-1的速率输入6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4氯化钠注射液7ml/kg。分别于全麻诱导插管后稳定10min(T1),将患者改为侧卧位稳定10min后(T2)、扩容3min后(T3)记录患者HR、MAP、SVV以及心脏指数(CI)。容量负荷阳性定义为容量负荷后CI增加≥15%为容量治疗有反应。结果与T1时比较,T2时两组SVV均明显降低(P<0.05)。与T2时比较,T3时两组HR明显减慢、SVV明显降低,MAP、CI明显升高(P<0.05)。49例患者为容量负荷阳性,3例为容量负荷阴性。容量负荷后所有阳性患者MAP以及CI明显升高(P<0.01),SVV明显降低(P<0.01)。L组SVV诊断阈值为10.5%,判断扩容有效的灵敏度为80.0%,特异度为72.7%;R组SVV的诊断阈值为10.5%,判断扩容有效的灵敏度为85.7%,特异度为83.3%。结论左侧卧位或右侧卧位时SVV判断血容量变化的准确性未受影响,准确性较高。 Objective To observe the effects of the lateral decubitus position during surgery on the stroke volume variation(SVV).The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of SVV to predict fluid response in mechanically ventilated patients in the lateral decubitus position during surgery.Methods Fifty two patients of ASA classⅠorⅡ,were randomly divided into left lateral decubitus position group(group L)and right lateral decubitus position group(group R).Volume expansion were performed before operation with 6% hetastarch 7ml/kg at the rate of 0.4ml·kg-1·min-1.HR,MAP,SVV and cardiac output(CI)were all recorded at ten minutes after the induction of anaesthesia(T1),10 min after patients changed to the lateral decubitus position(T2)and 3min after volume expansion(T3).If CI increased 15%,the volume expansion was defined as responsive to volume expansion.Results Compared with T1,two groups of SVV were obviously decreased at T2(P〈0.05).Compared with T2,HR and SVV in the two groups were decreased,MAP and CI were increased significantly(P〈0.05).Three patients were not responsive to volume expansion and forty nine were responsive.MAP and CI increased signiflcantly after volume expansion(P〈0.01),whereas SVV decreased signiflcantly after volume expansion(P〈0.01).Fluid responsiveness was predicted in left lateral decubitus position by SVV 10.5%(sensitivity=80%,specificity=72.7%).Fluid responsiveness was predicted in right lateral decubitus position by SVV 10.5%(sensitivity=85.7%,specificity=83.3%).Conclusion The accuracy of SVV judgements blood volume changes were not affected in left lateral decubitus position ad right lateral decubitus position.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期873-876,共4页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 每搏量变异 侧卧位 Stroke volume variation Lateral decubitus position
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid respon- siveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med, 2003,31 (5) .. 1399-1404.
  • 2Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, et al. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predictlfluid respon- siveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J An- aesth, 2010,104 (4) .. 407-413.
  • 3Powner DJ, Miller ER, Levine RL. CVP and PAOP measure- ment s are discordant during fluid therapy after traumatic brain injury. J Intensive Care Med, 2005,20(1) : 28-33.
  • 4Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, et al. Uncali- brated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous ther- modilution technique: effect s of alterations in arterial wave- form. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth, 2007,21(5) 636-643.
  • 5唐亮,裘毅敏,李士通.侧卧位开胸手术对每搏量变异度的影响[J].上海医学,2009,32(11):959-962. 被引量:16
  • 6Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplanta- tion., pulmonary artery catheter versus unealibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106 (6) 1480-1486.
  • 7Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergo- ing cardiac surgery validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg, 2008,106(3) 867-872.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer U J. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 1992, 18: 142-147.
  • 2Pinsky M R. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med, 2002, 28.. 386-388.
  • 3Reuter D A, Bayerlein J, Goepfert M S, et al. Influence oI tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med, 2003, 29: 476-480.
  • 4Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005, 22: 658-665.
  • 5LorsomradeeS, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, et al. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorae Vase Anesth, 2007, 21: 636-643.
  • 6Felbinger T W, Goepfert M S, Goresch T, et al. Accuracy of pulse contour cardiac index measurements during changes of preload and aortic impedance. Anaesthesist, 2005, 54: 755-762.
  • 7Manecke G R Jr, Auger W R. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2007, 21:3-7.
  • 8宋玉芳,田春芳,曹芳.开胸手术患者单肺通气过程中呼吸参数变化对气道压的影响[J].山东医药,2009,49(11):69-69. 被引量:3
  • 9秦海庆,赵如明,邹学超,刘继.单肺通气安全时限的临床研究[J].上海医学,2001,24(12):756-757. 被引量:3

共引文献15

同被引文献61

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部