期刊文献+

影响老年性聋患者助听效果的相关因素分析 被引量:8

The Factors Affecting the Effects of Hearing Aids on Presbycusis Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查老年感音神经性聋患者配戴助听器后的助听效果,分析其影响因素。方法采用日常生活助听满意度量表对120例验配了助听器的老年性聋患者进行调查,统计每例患者的各项得分及总均分,并根据患者年龄、性别、教育程度、平均听阈、助听器类型、佩戴方式、佩戴时长、每日使用时长、自感听力下降时长等9个因素进行分组,采用单因素分析及逐步多元回归分析进行统计处理,筛选影响助听效果的主要因素。结果教育程度高、每日佩戴时间长、双耳佩戴者得分高于教育程度低、每日佩戴时间短、单耳佩戴者(P<0.01);年长者得分优于年少者(P<0.01);自感听力下降时长短者得分高于自感听力下降时长长者(P<0.01);总体满意度方面,教育程度高、每日佩戴时间长者得分高于教育程度低、每日佩戴时间短者(P<0.01),性别因素对助听效果无影响。结论影响老年性聋患者助听效果的因素较多,其中教育程度、每日佩戴时长是主要因素,双耳佩戴、自感听力下降时间短、年长者助听效果满意度高,而性别对助听效果无明显影响。 Objective To analyze the factors affecting the effects of hearing aids in presbycusis patients . Methods One hundred and twenty cases with presbycusis were investigated by using general data and the Satisfac-tion with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire(SADL) .The individual scores and total scores of all the subjects were collected together with the personal information ,including age ,gender ,degree of education ,pure-tone aver-age ,hearing aid type ,monaural/binaural status ,total hearing aid experience ,daily use time ,the time of perceived hearing difficulty .A single factor analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis were used to filter out main fac-tors influencing the effect of hearing aids .Results The degree of education ,hearing aid type ,monaural/binaural status ,daily use time ,the time of perceived hearing difficulty were factors influencing the effect of hearing aids . The patients with higher level of education ,the longer daily use ,binaural status obtained more scores than those of the low degree of education ,the shorter daily use ,and monaural status( P〈 0 .01) .The older people felt better than the youngers(P〈0 .01) .The patients with long -time perceived hearing difficulty got more scores than those with short -time perceived hearing difficulty (P〈0 .01) .In general ,the degree of education ,and the daily use time were the main factors influencing the effects of hearing aids .Conclusion There are many factors that influence the effects of hearing aids ,in which the degree of education ,daily use time are the main factors ,and the combination of the two factors obtain the effects of hearing aid maximization ,and the binaural status ,the short time of perceived hearing difficulty and the older obtain better satisfaction .The gender doesn't significantly influence the effects of the hearing aids .
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期456-460,共5页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
关键词 老年性聋 助听器 多元回归分析 Presbycusis Hearing aids Regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1肖瑞春.老年性耳聋患者的心理表现[J].中国民康医学,2007,19(17):790-791. 被引量:4
  • 2Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplifi- cation in daily life: the SADL scale[J]. Ear Hear, 1999,20: 306.
  • 3Shah KA. Hearing aid outcomes in Chinese adults: clinical application and psychometric properties of the Chinese versionof the satisfaction with amplification in daily life questionnaire [J]. IntJ Audiol,2012,51:50.
  • 4李谨,王丽欣.助听器在老年性耳聋中的临床应用[J].中国老年保健医学,2011,9(5):60-60. 被引量:3
  • 5Kricos PB. The influence of nonaudiological variables on audi ological rehabilitation outeomes[-J']. Ear Hear, 2000,21 : 7S.
  • 6Hosford-Dunn H, Halpern J. Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: predictive validity of fitting variables satisfaction with amplification in daily lifeLJ]. J Am Aead Au- diol, 2001,12 : 15.
  • 7Smedley TC. Self-assessed satisfaction levels in elderly hear- ing aid, eyeglass, and denture wearers. A cross- modality comparison[J]. Ear Hear, 1990,11:41S.
  • 8Karlsson AK, Rosenhall U. Aural rehabilitation in the elder ly: supply of hearing aids related to measured need and self- assessed hearing problems[J]. Stand Audiol, 1998,27 : 153.
  • 9李鹏,王力红,蒋涛.听觉剥夺效应及对听力康复的影响[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2003,11(1):61-63. 被引量:5
  • 10Chang HP, Ho CY, Chou P. The factors associated with a self-perceived hearing handicap in elderly people with hear ing impairment- -results from a community-based study [J]. Ear Hear,2009,30:576.

二级参考文献25

  • 1胡岢.老年性耳聋的研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2005,34(2):8-11. 被引量:34
  • 2王美钗,黄丽琴.老年性耳聋患者的心理状况及护理对策[J].护理学报,2007,14(3):84-85. 被引量:10
  • 3[1]Silman S, Gelfand SA, Siverman CA. Effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1984,76:1357.
  • 4[2]Arlinger S, Gatehouse S, Bentler RA, et al. Report of the eriksholm workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimation[J]. Ear & Hearing,1996,17(3 Suppl) :87S.
  • 5[3]Gelfand SA, Silmau S. Apparent auditory deprivation in children: implications of monaural versus binaural amplification[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 1993,4:313.
  • 6[4]Hattori H. Ear dominance for nonsense - syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing - impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 1993,4:319.
  • 7[5]Dieroff HG. Late - onset auditory inactivity (deprivation) in persons with bilateral essentially symmetric and conductive hearing impairment [J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 1993,4:347.
  • 8[6]Gelfand SA, Silman S, Ross L. Long- term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss[J].Scand Audiol, 1987,16:201.
  • 9[7]Hood JJ. Speech discrimination in bilateral and unilateral hearing loss due to Meniere's disease[J]. Br J Audiol, 1984,18:173.
  • 10[8]Willot JF. Physiological plasticity in the auditory system and its possible relevance to hearing aid use, deprivation effects, and acclimation [J]. Ear & Hearing, 1996, 17(3 suppl) :66s.

共引文献9

同被引文献67

  • 1任红苗,任基浩.老年性聋的防治现状[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(2):555-557. 被引量:14
  • 2王宁宇.听力减退与认知障碍[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(10):797-800. 被引量:9
  • 3许卫华,王奇,梁伟雄.问卷或量表在病人依从性测量中的应用[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2007,15(4):403-405. 被引量:112
  • 4Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA. who wants a hearing aid? Person- ality profiles of hearing aid seekers. Ear Hear, 2005, 26(1): 12-26.
  • 5Knudsen LV, Oberg M, Nielsen C, et al. Factors influencing help seeking,hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif, 2010, 14(3): 127-154.
  • 6Cox RM, Alexander GC. measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the sadl scale. Ear Hear, 1999, 20(4): 306-320.
  • 7Lopez OL. Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2013, 19(2 Dementia): 411-424.
  • 8Ritchie K. Mild cognitive impairment: an epidemiological perspec-tive. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2004, 6(4): 401-408.
  • 9Nie H, Xu Y, Liu B, et al. The prevalence of mild eognitive impair- ment about elderly population in China: a meta-analysis. Int J Geri- atr Psychiatry, 2011, 26(6): 558-563.
  • 10Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cogni- tive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive im- pairment. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53(4): 695-699.

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部